Best explanation yet..
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
SOPA explained
Collapse
X
-
Just curious: if the system would consistently show the source of e.g. the images upploaded, would it make a difference?Originally posted by KRSESQ View PostGiven the amount of hotlinking and cutting-and-pasting we do here, under SOPA our little sandbox would get shut down pretty quick. The thumbnail image of that MJ album cover would be enough to do it!
After all, there is an an exception in the copyright law for quotation and citation...
Comment
-
SOPA makes no provision for that. That's one of the problems with it. Unless you have specific, expressed permission for every bit of data you post, you could be shut down. Without so much as a hearing.Originally posted by VJ View PostJust curious: if the system would consistently show the source of e.g. the images upploaded, would it make a difference?
After all, there is an an exception in the copyright law for quotation and citation...
Ironic that a computer network created to survive a nuclear attack might be brought down by clueless lawyers and politicians.
Comment
-
I think they know exactly what they are doing. They don't mind sending us back to the stone age for their profits.Originally posted by KRSESQ View PostIronic that a computer network created to survive a nuclear attack might be brought down by clueless lawyers and politicians."For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."
Comment
-
“Inside every sane person there’s a madman struggling to get outâ€
–The Light Fantastic, Terry Pratchett
Comment
-
Under US law copyright ends where satire, parody and politics begin, which is why the above image would likely be OK. This is what lets Weird Al Yankovich and Paul Shanklin do their song parodies.
As to the law - it was a mess, so getting it improved is good.Dr. Mordrid
----------------------------
An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.
I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps
Comment
-
The problem with SOPA and PIPA is that they would enable sites to be brought down with even less proof (as in none at all) of actual copyright infringement.Originally posted by Dr Mordrid View PostUnder US law copyright ends where satire, parody and politics begin, which is why the above image would likely be OK. This is what lets Weird Al Yankovich and Paul Shanklin do their song parodies.
As to the law - it was a mess, so getting it improved is good.
The problem we already face is that content hosting providers like YouTube already provide copyright owners (of the powerful, greedy kind) with a way to avoid having to even worry about the existing DMCA by letting them remove content as they please.“And, remember: there's no 'I' in 'irony'†~ Merlin Mann
Comment

Comment