Ok, I'm starting a thread. I promised myself I wouldn't, but I don't know anywhere ELSE to have an intelligent discussion. (Shades of Monty Python... "I came here for a good argument!" "No you didn't, you came here for an argument...")
...
Anyway, this is going to sound a bit ranty. I apologize in advance.
Let me start by saying that I'm a luddite in some respects. We own thousands of books. (Well ok, maybe A thousand...) I love books. I love the feel of books, the smell of books. I love going to the bookstore and being surrounded by books. So I'm a little biased.
Also, I'm in FAVOR of the existence of e-readers. Especially if they get people like my brother-in-law (Mr. "I've never read a book for pleasure") to read.
A couple years ago, Claymonkey and Jesster and I did a podcast about e-books. At that time, the general consensus was that the technology just wasn't there.
So I revisited the idea a couple weeks ago... and decided that for SOME people the technology might be there, but for me it's still a no-fly.
Putting aside the idea that I will simply never own an e-reader because I love books (see above), let's assume that I might consider it one day. What would such a device have to do?
1. Typesetting.
Many people don't realize that when you buy a book from the bookstore, you're not just buying the story and the editing. You're paying for typsetting, graphic design, layout. People choose fonts. They set up kerning. They make sure that the margins are good.
The nicest e-books in the world use sh!tty built-in system fonts. I don't care how generally good "courier new" is, it's not a typsetting font. And the automatic kerning is crap. It pains me to read such a thing. There's a reason I don't read books on my computer, after all.
This should be fixable. It hasn't been fixed yet - I suspect licensing costs on fonts, technology problems with the formats, etc.
2. Good screen.
Seriously, e-ink was a start. But you know what has a REALLY good intensity and white/black ratio? Paper. For real. Can we please make a screen that looks like paper?
Don't get me started on the "paper white" kindling. By "paper white" they mean "lots of blue LED's". Blue LED's hurt your eyes. Long term they trash your photoreceptors. Those of us with sensitive eyes can't even look at them. Not sure why "white" has come to be synonymous with "blue", but it just ain't so.
3. Books are cheap.
Books are cheap. E-Books are NOT cheap. I looked up the last 5 books I read, and all of them were cheaper in paperback than in e-book. By a large margin. ($8-$9 versus $10-$15!)
Fix this.
4. Stupid devices.
Let me be clear here. When I want to read, what I'd really like to do is... read. Can we please have an e-reader with:
- A screen the size of a paperback book.
- No keyboard.
- e-ink.
I'm sure one exists. But it has something else terrible and broken, like it only comes in chartreuse, or it electrocutes you when you turn a page. Maybe I'm prejudiced but EVERY TIME I look at these devices they suck.
5. Lend/borrow/give.
You know what's awesome about books? I can buy them used. There's a used bookstore near my office, and the owner loves science fiction. I've been buying TONS of old prints of Asimov and Dick. And then I can lend my modern prints to my friends, or my kids. I can't lend e-books. I can't buy them used. I can't borrow them. I can't sell them.
------------
So in summary, right now I can... pay a lot of money for a device that doesn't look or feel like a book, has terrible typesetting, has books that cost sometimes double the price of a real book, has DRM, can't be lent/borrowed/sold, and probably comes with a giant keyboard. The screen is either too small or too big, and probably uses blue LED's to scar my retina. Or else can't be read in most lighting conditions.
Thoughts?
I know this was ranty. I warned you in advance. Repeatedly. I just feel like this is techology that OUGHT to exist, OUGHT to work, OUGHT to be good... and doesn't/isn't.
...
Anyway, this is going to sound a bit ranty. I apologize in advance.
Let me start by saying that I'm a luddite in some respects. We own thousands of books. (Well ok, maybe A thousand...) I love books. I love the feel of books, the smell of books. I love going to the bookstore and being surrounded by books. So I'm a little biased.
Also, I'm in FAVOR of the existence of e-readers. Especially if they get people like my brother-in-law (Mr. "I've never read a book for pleasure") to read.
A couple years ago, Claymonkey and Jesster and I did a podcast about e-books. At that time, the general consensus was that the technology just wasn't there.
So I revisited the idea a couple weeks ago... and decided that for SOME people the technology might be there, but for me it's still a no-fly.
Putting aside the idea that I will simply never own an e-reader because I love books (see above), let's assume that I might consider it one day. What would such a device have to do?
1. Typesetting.
Many people don't realize that when you buy a book from the bookstore, you're not just buying the story and the editing. You're paying for typsetting, graphic design, layout. People choose fonts. They set up kerning. They make sure that the margins are good.
The nicest e-books in the world use sh!tty built-in system fonts. I don't care how generally good "courier new" is, it's not a typsetting font. And the automatic kerning is crap. It pains me to read such a thing. There's a reason I don't read books on my computer, after all.
This should be fixable. It hasn't been fixed yet - I suspect licensing costs on fonts, technology problems with the formats, etc.
2. Good screen.
Seriously, e-ink was a start. But you know what has a REALLY good intensity and white/black ratio? Paper. For real. Can we please make a screen that looks like paper?
Don't get me started on the "paper white" kindling. By "paper white" they mean "lots of blue LED's". Blue LED's hurt your eyes. Long term they trash your photoreceptors. Those of us with sensitive eyes can't even look at them. Not sure why "white" has come to be synonymous with "blue", but it just ain't so.
3. Books are cheap.
Books are cheap. E-Books are NOT cheap. I looked up the last 5 books I read, and all of them were cheaper in paperback than in e-book. By a large margin. ($8-$9 versus $10-$15!)
Fix this.
4. Stupid devices.
Let me be clear here. When I want to read, what I'd really like to do is... read. Can we please have an e-reader with:
- A screen the size of a paperback book.
- No keyboard.
- e-ink.
I'm sure one exists. But it has something else terrible and broken, like it only comes in chartreuse, or it electrocutes you when you turn a page. Maybe I'm prejudiced but EVERY TIME I look at these devices they suck.
5. Lend/borrow/give.
You know what's awesome about books? I can buy them used. There's a used bookstore near my office, and the owner loves science fiction. I've been buying TONS of old prints of Asimov and Dick. And then I can lend my modern prints to my friends, or my kids. I can't lend e-books. I can't buy them used. I can't borrow them. I can't sell them.
------------
So in summary, right now I can... pay a lot of money for a device that doesn't look or feel like a book, has terrible typesetting, has books that cost sometimes double the price of a real book, has DRM, can't be lent/borrowed/sold, and probably comes with a giant keyboard. The screen is either too small or too big, and probably uses blue LED's to scar my retina. Or else can't be read in most lighting conditions.
Thoughts?
I know this was ranty. I warned you in advance. Repeatedly. I just feel like this is techology that OUGHT to exist, OUGHT to work, OUGHT to be good... and doesn't/isn't.
Comment