Tweet
The move itself is destructive posturing.*
The Russians can say "don't use our engines to launch US military satellites," but if the US says "shove it," what does Russia do? Their only real option is to cut the US off as threatened with two possible results,*
Russia makes less money selling fewer engines, or*
Russia makes no money selling no engines.*
Either way the die is cast,
Commercial Crew, Bigelow Aerospace and the RD-180 replacement program, please report to the on-deck circle.
SpaceX's Dragon 2 flight hardware taking a bow May 29 couldn't be better timed. 2 launch abort thruster tests this summer and it's ready for on-orbit tests.
US ISS managers are already creating contingencies, and don't be surprised if Commercial Crew gets a larger acceleration from Congress.
NASA has announced that after ISS they will use commercial space stations, probably based on Bigelow's tech, and the first ISS testbed flies in 2015. 2 earlier testbeds have been in orbit since 2006 & 2007. One of their new designs is 2x the internal volume of ISS*per module.
http://m.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9338626...44feabdc0.html
The Russians can say "don't use our engines to launch US military satellites," but if the US says "shove it," what does Russia do? Their only real option is to cut the US off as threatened with two possible results,*
Russia makes less money selling fewer engines, or*
Russia makes no money selling no engines.*
Either way the die is cast,
Commercial Crew, Bigelow Aerospace and the RD-180 replacement program, please report to the on-deck circle.
SpaceX's Dragon 2 flight hardware taking a bow May 29 couldn't be better timed. 2 launch abort thruster tests this summer and it's ready for on-orbit tests.
US ISS managers are already creating contingencies, and don't be surprised if Commercial Crew gets a larger acceleration from Congress.
NASA has announced that after ISS they will use commercial space stations, probably based on Bigelow's tech, and the first ISS testbed flies in 2015. 2 earlier testbeds have been in orbit since 2006 & 2007. One of their new designs is 2x the internal volume of ISS*per module.
http://m.ft.com/intl/cms/s/0/9338626...44feabdc0.html
Russia to deny US space station access
Russia is to deny the US use of the International Space Station beyond 2020 and will also bar its rocket engines from launching US military satellites as it hits back at American sanctions imposed over the Ukraine crisis.
The twin moves against the space and satellite programmes represent one high-tech niche in which Moscow believes it has leverage over the US.
“The Russian segment of the ISS can exist independently from the US one, but the US segment cannot exist independently from the Russian one,†said Dmitry Rogozin, deputy prime minister, pointing to the fact that the US can no longer send astronauts to the station on its own. The US space shuttle fleet retired in 2011 as a result of Nasa funding cuts.
The announcement could curb Russian-American co-operation in areas so far unimpeded by the increasingly poisonous political climate between the two countries.
As Moscow’s stand-off with Ukraine escalated in recent months into the worst falling-out with the west since the Cold War, both US and Russian diplomats had noted that the two powers continued to “do business†pragmatically in areas of global significance. “Space is obviously no longer part of that,†said one western diplomat.
Washington last month decided to revoke export licences for technology goods that can be used militarily by Russia and to refuse to extend new ones. Washington is also considering new restrictions on the export of high-tech equipment to develop Russia’s energy resources.
Moscow’s move against the ISS came in the form of a rejection of a US request to use the station beyond 2020. The ISS, jointly maintained by several countries, has been continuously manned by rotating missions for more than 13 years and is used for research, some of which is considered vital for further space exploration.
Assuming Russia does not reconsider, its decision could strengthen China, which aims to have its own space station by 2020 and is currently excluded from the ISS – chiefly because of opposition from the US.
Mr Rogozin said Moscow would not impose sanctions of its own, and would not obstruct the work of US astronauts. However, he called the US an “unreliable†technology partner and said the government was therefore seeking to intensify work with other countries.
Roscosmos, the Russian space agency, is due to present new plans for space exploration to parliament. Mr Rogozin said it was looking to redirect funds from manned space flight to other, more promising areas and had been advised to seek co-operation with Asian countries.
Mr Rogozin said Russia would continue to supply MK-33 and RD-180 rocket engines to the US, but would require a guarantee that they would not be used to launch military satellites.
Russia also threatened to switch off 11 GPS ground stations on its territory unless the US agrees to its request to establish a similar station for its own satellite position system Glonass in the US. The GPS ground stations would be suspended from June 1 and switched off on September 1 if a bilateral working group failed to reach consensus on the Glonass issue, Mr Rogozin said.
GPS, on which services such as navigation and mapping apps rely, would still work as its satellites continue to operate. But it would lose accuracy because the ground stations help correct the satellite data.
Russia is to deny the US use of the International Space Station beyond 2020 and will also bar its rocket engines from launching US military satellites as it hits back at American sanctions imposed over the Ukraine crisis.
The twin moves against the space and satellite programmes represent one high-tech niche in which Moscow believes it has leverage over the US.
“The Russian segment of the ISS can exist independently from the US one, but the US segment cannot exist independently from the Russian one,†said Dmitry Rogozin, deputy prime minister, pointing to the fact that the US can no longer send astronauts to the station on its own. The US space shuttle fleet retired in 2011 as a result of Nasa funding cuts.
The announcement could curb Russian-American co-operation in areas so far unimpeded by the increasingly poisonous political climate between the two countries.
As Moscow’s stand-off with Ukraine escalated in recent months into the worst falling-out with the west since the Cold War, both US and Russian diplomats had noted that the two powers continued to “do business†pragmatically in areas of global significance. “Space is obviously no longer part of that,†said one western diplomat.
Washington last month decided to revoke export licences for technology goods that can be used militarily by Russia and to refuse to extend new ones. Washington is also considering new restrictions on the export of high-tech equipment to develop Russia’s energy resources.
Moscow’s move against the ISS came in the form of a rejection of a US request to use the station beyond 2020. The ISS, jointly maintained by several countries, has been continuously manned by rotating missions for more than 13 years and is used for research, some of which is considered vital for further space exploration.
Assuming Russia does not reconsider, its decision could strengthen China, which aims to have its own space station by 2020 and is currently excluded from the ISS – chiefly because of opposition from the US.
Mr Rogozin said Moscow would not impose sanctions of its own, and would not obstruct the work of US astronauts. However, he called the US an “unreliable†technology partner and said the government was therefore seeking to intensify work with other countries.
Roscosmos, the Russian space agency, is due to present new plans for space exploration to parliament. Mr Rogozin said it was looking to redirect funds from manned space flight to other, more promising areas and had been advised to seek co-operation with Asian countries.
Mr Rogozin said Russia would continue to supply MK-33 and RD-180 rocket engines to the US, but would require a guarantee that they would not be used to launch military satellites.
Russia also threatened to switch off 11 GPS ground stations on its territory unless the US agrees to its request to establish a similar station for its own satellite position system Glonass in the US. The GPS ground stations would be suspended from June 1 and switched off on September 1 if a bilateral working group failed to reach consensus on the Glonass issue, Mr Rogozin said.
GPS, on which services such as navigation and mapping apps rely, would still work as its satellites continue to operate. But it would lose accuracy because the ground stations help correct the satellite data.
Comment