I saw a quick blurb about this on TV somewhere, so I looked it up:
It's basically a $10000 windmill that can generate 20%-90% of the average households energy needs. And on days/times where you generate more power than you use you sell back the power to the grid (federal law mandates this). They claim that the average household can pay it off in 7-12 years, depending on rebates, tax credits and how much energy you sell back. It's pretty interesting.
The biggest downfall, besides the steep investment, is the tower size. The windmill has to be 20' (6 m) higher that than everything else within a 500 ft (~150 m) radius.
It would interesting if you had enough land to put two up and generate 100% of your power and always be selling to the grid. You could probably pay off the investment pretty quick since the grid is always hungry. In theory.
Now we just need efficient solar cells and we're set.
Jammrock
It's basically a $10000 windmill that can generate 20%-90% of the average households energy needs. And on days/times where you generate more power than you use you sell back the power to the grid (federal law mandates this). They claim that the average household can pay it off in 7-12 years, depending on rebates, tax credits and how much energy you sell back. It's pretty interesting.
The biggest downfall, besides the steep investment, is the tower size. The windmill has to be 20' (6 m) higher that than everything else within a 500 ft (~150 m) radius.
It would interesting if you had enough land to put two up and generate 100% of your power and always be selling to the grid. You could probably pay off the investment pretty quick since the grid is always hungry. In theory.
Now we just need efficient solar cells and we're set.
Jammrock
Comment