Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The F-22 @ Red Flag

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The F-22 @ Red Flag



    Sounds like quite a ride

    Article....

    >
    Invisibility - even with eyes on

    When the Raptor finds itself in a dogfight, it is no longer beyond visual range, but the advantage of stealth isn't diminished. It maintains "high ground" even at close range.

    "I can't see the [expletive deleted] thing," said RAAF Squadron Leader Stephen Chappell, exchange F-15 pilot in the 65th Aggressor Squadron. "It won't let me put a weapons system on it, even when I can see it visually through the canopy. [Flying against the F-22] annoys the hell out of me."

    Lt. Col. Larry Bruce, 65th AS commander, admits flying against the Raptor is a very frustrating experience. Reluctantly, he admitted "it's humbling to fly against the F-22," - humbling, not only because of its stealth, but also its unmatched maneuverability and power.

    Turn and burn

    Thrust vectoring, internal weapons mounting and increased power all contribute to the Raptor's maneuvering advantage. From the cockpit of the F-22, Capt. Brian Budde, 94th FS pilot, explained the F-22 is able to sustain more than nine Gs for much longer than the F-15, without running out of airspeed. From the pilot's perspective, the F-22 "is more power than you know what to do with," said Captain Budde. So much power, in fact, the F-22 enjoys capabilities alien to legacy fighters.

    This boost of thrust enables the Raptor to take off with a full load of weapons and fuel. Furthermore, mach speeds are attainable without afterburners (supercruise) and coincidently, the F-22 features better fuel efficiency than legacy fighters. This increased fuel efficiency raises eyebrows considering the F-22 boasts 20,000 more pounds of thrust than the F-15 Eagle it's replacing.
    >
    Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 25 February 2007, 00:21.
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

  • #2
    So...back to cannons?

    edit: BTW, I wonder how MIG-29 would fare in this (only this ) scenario...it has supposedly exceptional gun tracking system (laser rangefinder and infrared) and is quite maneuverable. Anyway, we can arrange this and check, Polish Air Force still uses large number of them (actually I wouldn't be surprised if this is already done/already arranged...)
    Last edited by Nowhere; 25 February 2007, 07:26.

    Comment


    • #3
      Beautiful aircrafts - all three mentioned (F15, F22 and Mig-29).
      "For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism."

      Comment


      • #4
        Somehow I doubt opponents will get close enough for Mig-29's gun to come into play.
        Dr. Mordrid
        ----------------------------
        An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

        I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

        Comment


        • #5
          Well, that wasn't the point

          Comment

          Working...
          X