Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Brain-like computer

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Brain-like computer


    The image demonstrates the design of an artificial brain built using a nano-brain reported in this issue of PNAS. Several molecular nano-brain are arranged in a way to work as powerful as our central nervous system. Numerical digits and alphabets float across the architecture demonstrating a matrix generated during a real-time operation similar to the Hollywood blockbuster The Matrix.

    Cosmic Log article....


    Cosmic Log video....

    Researchers model new nano-computer after the circuitry of the brain.


    Tiny Brain-Like Computer Created

    The most powerful computer known is the brain, and now scientists have designed a machine just a few molecules large that mimics how the brain works.

    So far the device can simultaneously carry out 16 times more operations than a normal computer transistor. Researchers suggest the invention might eventually prove able to perform roughly 1,000 times more operations than a transistor.

    This machine could not only serve as the foundation of a powerful computer, but also serve as the controlling element of complex gadgets such as microscopic doctors or factories, scientists added.

    The device is made of a compound known as duroquinone. This molecule resembles a hexagonal plate with four cones linked to it, "like a small car," explained researcher Anirban Bandyopadhyay, an artificial intelligence and molecular electronics scientist at the National Institute for Materials Science at Tsukuba in Japan.

    Duroquinone is less than a nanometer, or a billionth of a meter large. This makes it hundreds of times smaller than a wavelength of visible light.

    The machine is made of 17 duroquinone molecules. One molecule sits at the center of a ring formed by the remaining 16. The entire invention sits on a surface of gold.


    How it works

    Scientists operate the device by tweaking the center duroquinone with electrical pulses from an extremely sharp electrically conductive needle. The molecule and its four cones can shift around in a variety of ways depending on different properties of the pulse — say, the pulse's strength.

    Since weak chemical bonds link the center duroquinone with the surrounding 16 duroquinones, each of those shifts too. Imagine, for instance, a spider in the middle of a web made of 16 strands. If the spider moves in one direction, each thread linked to it experiences a slightly different tug from all the others.

    In this way, a pulse to the central duroquinone can simultaneously transmit different instructions to each of the surrounding 16 duroquinones. The researchers say this design was inspired by that of brain cells, which can radiate branches out like a tree, with each branch used to communicate with another brain cell.

    "All those connections are why the brain is so powerful," Bandyopadhyay said.

    Since duroquinone possesses four cones, each molecule essentially has four different settings. Since the central molecule can simultaneously control 16 other duroquinones, mathematically this means a single pulse at the machine can have 4^16 — or nearly 4.3 billion — different outcomes.

    In comparison, a normal computer transistor can only carry out just one instruction at once, and only has two settings — 0 and 1. This means a single pulse at it can only have two different outcomes.

    Putting it to work

    The idea is to hook this new gadget up with other molecules — either copies of itself or different compounds other scientists have invented. For instance, researchers have created a host of machines just a molecule or so large over the last decade or two — motors, propellers, switches, elevators, sensors and so on. The new invention might offer a way to control all those other compounds to work as a whole. Indeed, Bandyopadhyay and his colleagues revealed they could hook up eight other such "molecular machines" to their invention, working together as if they were part of a miniature factory.

    This invention could serve as the controlling element of complex assemblies of molecular machines, Bandyopadhyay suggested. One future application for such assemblies "could be in medical science," he told LiveScience. "Imagine taking assemblies of molecular machines and inserting them into the blood, perhaps if you wanted to destroy a tumor inside the body."

    The device currently is operated with an extremely sharp electrically conductive needle — specifically, that belonging to a scanning tunneling microscope, a bulky machine far larger than the 17 molecules in question. However, Bandyopadhyay hopes that in the future they can issue commands to their invention using molecules that deliver electric pulses instead.

    The device needs to be made in vacuum conditions at extremely cold temperatures — about -321 degrees F (-196 degrees C). Bandyopadhyay said it could be operated at room temperature, however.

    More powerful still

    Bandyopadhyay added they could expand their device from a two-dimensional ring of 16 duroquinones around the center to a three-dimensional sphere of 1,024 duroquinones. This means it could perform 1,024 instructions at once, for 4^1024 different outcomes — a number larger than a 1 with 1,000 zeroes after it. They would control the molecule at the center of the sphere by manipulating "handles" sticking out from the core.

    "We are definitely going to 3-D from 2-D immediately," Bandyopadhyay said.

    Bandyopadhyay and his colleague Somobrata Acharya detailed their findings online March 10 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
    Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 10 March 2008, 20:42.
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

  • #2
    I can't help feeling just a little nervous about new computing advances like this. I strenuously hope they design the Three Rules into the thing.

    It would be ultimately ironic if the intelligent machines we create end up being more honest, trustworthy, and humane than us.

    Kevin

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes, it would. This thing sounds like a "positronic brain" without the positrons - yet.

      Once again hats off to Asimov for creating the concept and Roddenberry for popularizing it.

      Problem is the 3 laws are no guarantee as noted in several of Asimov's follow-up stories.

      To fix this Asimov added the "Zeroth Law ", so numbered so it could precede the first three;

      "A robot may not harm humanity, or, by inaction, allow humanity to come to harm."

      and the other three laws were modified with a condition that the Zeroth Law was not to be broken.

      Later Lyuban Dilov added a fourth law in "Icarus's Way" ;

      "A robot must establish its identity as a robot in all cases"

      Harry Harrison added his own fourth law in "Foundations Friends";

      "A robot must reproduce, as long as such reproduction does not interfere with the First or Second or Third Law."

      I'm undecided which I prefer, but Dilov's makes more sense in light of the Zeroth Law. I'm also uncomfortable with robots creating other robots without human control over the process.

      Nikola Kezarovski added a fifth law in the short story "The Fifth Law of Robotics";

      "A robot must know it is a robot"

      which is more an extension of Dilov's fourth law than a duplication.
      Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 11 March 2008, 08:15.
      Dr. Mordrid
      ----------------------------
      An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

      I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

      Comment


      • #4
        I find it extremely interesting and somehow comforting that scientists so readily use and consider canon for a subject something that came out of science fiction. It shows an odd form of modesty. Though the best writers in the field were scientists in their own right. Considering how many scientists became scientists because of an early love of sci-fi I suppose it isn't surprising though.

        Before deciding I wanted to be an artist in the 6th grade I wanted to be a scientist. A steady diet of Star Trek, Star Wars and Transformers definitely didn't hurt. A grandfather and father with careers in the Air Force along with computers becoming a permanent fixture in the house by 4th grade didn't hurt either. I worry that a love of science for science's sake is less common than it was for most of the 20th century.
        Wikipedia and Google.... the needles to my tangent habit.
        ________________________________________________

        That special feeling we get in the cockles of our hearts, Or maybe below the cockles, Maybe in the sub-cockle area, Maybe in the liver, Maybe in the kidneys, Maybe even in the colon, We don't know.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by Claymonkey View Post
          I find it extremely interesting and somehow comforting that scientists so readily use and consider canon for a subject something that came out of science fiction. It shows an odd form of modesty. Though the best writers in the field were scientists in their own right. Considering how many scientists became scientists because of an early love of sci-fi I suppose it isn't surprising though.
          I was about to mention that Asimov had several PhD's in diverse hard sciences.
          The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!

          I'm the least you could do
          If only life were as easy as you
          I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
          If only life were as easy as you
          I would still get screwed

          Comment

          Working...
          X