Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Contact lens display

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Contact lens display

    The circuitry problem noted in the article may well have been solved by better means as MIT has developed a biodegradable substrate for IC's that would allow them to be mated to flesh (ie: a brain machine interface self-molded to the cerebrum's curvatures) or material like that in these lenses only to have it degrade and the electronics be left behind in situ. Alternatively the entire circuit could also be made biodegradable for temporary medical devices.

    That aside: fully evolved this could essentially replace current display technologies in portable devices or even desktops. I can also imagine them being integrated into ocular implants - even when no lens replacement is necessary such as with cataract surgeries. There is already the ability to insert an implant in front of a working natural lens for correcting vision (essentially, implanted contacts) so implanting one of these as a "bionic enhancement" isn't out of the realm of possibility.

    Who knows? Maybe we will become the Borg



    Link....

    Contact lenses to get built-in virtual graphics

    A contact lens that harvests radio waves to power an LED is paving the way for a new kind of display. The lens is a prototype of a device that could display information beamed from a mobile device.

    Realising that display size is increasingly a constraint in mobile devices, Babak Parviz at the University of Washington, in Seattle, hit on the idea of projecting images into the eye from a contact lens.

    One of the limitations of current head-up displays is their limited field of view. A contact lens display can have a much wider field of view. "Our hope is to create images that effectively float in front of the user perhaps 50 cm to 1 m away," says Parviz.

    His research involves embedding nanoscale and microscale electronic devices in substrates like paper or plastic. He also wears contact lenses. "It was a matter of putting the two together," he says.

    Fitting a contact lens with circuitry is challenging. The polymer cannot withstand the temperatures or chemicals used in large-scale microfabrication, Parviz explains. So, some components – the power-harvesting circuitry and the micro light-emitting diode – had to be made separately, encased in a biocompatible material and then placed into crevices carved into the lens.

    One obvious problem is powering such a device. The circuitry requires 330 microwatts but doesn't need a battery. Instead, a loop antenna picks up power beamed from a nearby radio source. The team has tested the lens by fitting it to a rabbit.

    Parviz says that future versions will be able to harvest power from a user's cell phone, perhaps as it beams information to the lens. They will also have more pixels and an array of microlenses to focus the image so that it appears suspended in front of the wearer's eyes.

    Despite the limited space available, each component can be integrated into the lens without obscuring the wearer's view, the researchers claim. As to what kinds of images can be viewed on this screen, the possibilities seem endless. Examples include subtitles when conversing with a foreign-language speaker, directions in unfamiliar territory and captioned photographs. The lens could also serve as a head-up display for pilots or gamers.

    Mark Billinghurst, director of the Human Interface Technology Laboratory, in Christchurch, New Zealand, is impressed with the work. "A contact lens that allows virtual graphics to be seamlessly overlaid on the real world could provide a compelling augmented reality experience," he says. This prototype is an important first step in that direction, though it may be years before the lens becomes commercially available, he adds.

    The University of Washington team will present their prototype at the Biomedical Circuits and Systems (BioCas 2009) conference at Beijing later this month.
    Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 13 November 2009, 00:33.
    Dr. Mordrid
    ----------------------------
    An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

    I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

  • #2
    Would be awesome for cheating on exams
    Q9450 + TRUE, G.Skill 2x2GB DDR2, GTX 560, ASUS X48, 1TB WD Black, Windows 7 64-bit, LG M2762D-PM 27" + 17" LG 1752TX, Corsair HX620, Antec P182, Logitech G5 (Blue)
    Laptop: MSI Wind - Black

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Mehen View Post
      Would be awesome for cheating on exams
      Reminds me of the movie..."I Spy"

      Comment


      • #4
        What worries me about the potential usefulness of these devices is that only a small area at the centre of vision is designed for really high detail. Since you can't scan your eye across something fixed to it, what useful display area can there be?
        FT.

        Comment


        • #5
          You're talking about the fovea centralis which has a field of view of about 5 degrees +/-. Add the parafovea and you can double (about the size of a full moon) or triple that, though with less acuity the further from the 1.5mm central region you get. That out of the way there are at least 3 interleaved features you could use to mitigate the problem;

          1 adjustable transparency (transparent OLED displays came out earlier this year) of the display, which allows;

          2. positionable display when detail is required - possibly automatically (smart tracking)

          3. overlays optionally on one eye only, or both, depending on how you use the little black box: dedicated/pda/smart phone etc.

          Not to mention the limitations of the fovea and parafovea don't stop you from enjoying a widescreen movie in a theater, do they? A panoramic landscape? In both of these cases the brain makes up for these limitations.

          Variants on this are expected to show up in areas as diverse as HUD's for fighters to occular prosthetics.
          Last edited by Dr Mordrid; 20 November 2009, 09:45.
          Dr. Mordrid
          ----------------------------
          An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

          I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

          Comment


          • #6
            I think I would prefer a stylish monocle.

            Kevin

            Comment


            • #7
              doc, I think you missed the point - have you ever worn contacts? they are usually not fixed (at least not mine) in one position. to be sharp, the picture would always have to stay in the center of the pupil, and could only be rather small. we can´t scan a larger picture with the pupil below the contact - unless you do some kind of "virtual scrolling".

              as overlay ("put context to what I am looking at") it would be fine, but I somehow fail to see the appeal for movies, unless you implement virtual scrolling (eye moves, the picture follows).

              mfg
              wulfman
              "Perhaps they communicate by changing colour? Like those sea creatures .."
              "Lobsters?"
              "Really? I didn't know they did that."
              "Oh yes, red means help!"

              Comment


              • #8
                Yes, I've tried contacts and they were rather stable. Still, I think the larger use for these is as an implant for use as an elective augmentation placed in front of a natural lens (can be done now for some corrections - permanent contacts if you will) or an add-on in conjunction with treatment for hyperopia and myopia (as my implants could be used) or cataracts (as mine are used).
                Dr. Mordrid
                ----------------------------
                An elephant is a mouse built to government specifications.

                I carry a gun because I can't throw a rock 1,250 fps

                Comment

                Working...
                X