Don't install SP2 if you have an AM64 system

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 2
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous 1 2 template Next
  • KeiFront
    Super MURCer
    • Sep 2001
    • 2668
    #16
    It could be a bug, but it could also be hack to fix a bug in some third party component, or ...
    Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
    Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
    Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSI

      Comment

      • Wombat
        Super MURCer
        • Aug 2000
        • 9498
        #17
        Originally posted by Indiana
        Well, but still I think any decent written software should NEVER try to execute code that's explicitely marked as storage data...
        This would make a BIG security-hole, or?
        If it's old code, then the data COULDN'T have been marked for the NX bit.
        Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

          Comment

          • High_Jumbllama
            Super MURCer
            • Dec 1999
            • 4522
            #18
            Originally posted by Indiana
            Well, but still I think any decent written software should NEVER try to execute code that's explicitely marked as storage data...
            This would make a BIG security-hole, or?
            That did not stop developers from doing it for some performance boosting.

              Comment

              Previous 1 2 template Next
              Working...