Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

a DOPE ee

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • a DOPE ee

    http://www.zdnet.com/products/storie...386980,00.html

  • #2
    If you read the article closely, keeping in mind that the only real event he relates is having had his e-mail go unanswered, then the whole thing can be viewed as a pathetic flame... Of course, that doesn't mean that what he says isn't true.

    Comment


    • #3
      Dvorak sometimes states his case poorly but there is usually some insight if you dig deep enough ;^)

      His opinion that Adobe is out of touch and that it's product line is a shambles is mark-on though.

      The last two "updates" to Photoshop have been jokes and Premiere is far from a "premiere" product. It's compatability leaves a lot to be desired, even with vidcap cards it portends to support.

      As for Acrobat; I HATE downloading a 200k doc file that ends up with only 5 double-spaced pages of unenhanced text. Who needs it? Bloatware.

      There be trouble in Adobe city....

      Dr. Mordrid

      Comment


      • #4
        It's an interesting article. But it's 8 months old, I'm surprised you're just reading it now. I know I won't get too many to agree, but I still prefer Premiere over MSP (but not on the Marvel) when it's working on other cards I think it's great. I agree, on Marvels it's a joke. I'm also biased since that's the package I learned in school, and after that on an Avid (not Avid Cinema, that program is absolute garbage, and the fact it has Avid's name on it makes me sick. I'm talking about their pro turnkey systems), but I couldn't get a home version of that (they ain't cheap). That being said I hate Macs, even though I like Adobe software, who still writes windows programs like they're gonna run on a Mac.

        I do agree the last few upgrades for PS (5.0 and 5.5) have not given me enough of a reason to upgrade, but I'm perfectly happy to use 4.0. And I must admit Acrobat is bloated and at times unnecessary (although it does have its place).

        I think it's interesting to substitute "Adobe" for "Matrox" in the article:

        Adobe is going through an identity crisis and suffering from isolationism, which leaves it open to attack from Microsoft. The company's future is not secure.

        Matrox is going through an identity crisis and suffering from isolationism, which leaves it open to attack from its competitors. The company's future is not secure.

        Filmgeek



        [This message has been edited by Filmgeek (edited 30 October 1999).]

        Comment


        • #5
          Interesting commentary, FilmGeek.

          I suppose I prefer MediaStudio Pro
          over Premiere for the same reason:
          I learned on MediaStudio Pro and I've
          learned to exploit its strengths to the
          max and I've also learned to minimize
          its weaknesses. It gets the job done
          rather consistently... and MSPro has
          a lot of tools built-in that with
          Premiere would require buying additional
          plug-in software.

          I suppose that had I learned on Premiere,
          I would've preferred Premiere. But keep
          in mind, Premiere 5 has only been out since,
          what, spring of last year???

          MediaStudio Pro 5.2 has been out since the
          Fall of 1997.

          Premiere 5 is wayyyy different than
          Premiere 4.2 as far as the interface is
          concerned.

          Actually, I read the Dvorak piece when it
          was published earlier this year... and
          I think the gist of his commentary is this:

          Adobe Premiere stands a chance of being
          renamed "Microsoft Premiere" if Microsoft
          continues its predatory market behavior.

          His point is well-taken about Microsoft
          now entering the image editing and desktop
          publishing arena formerly dominated by
          Adobe and Corel.

          If anybody stands a good chance of being
          taken over... I think it's Corel. I
          read earlier this year... that Adobe...
          in an effort to become "bigger" and better
          able to fend off Microsoft... was looking
          at taking over Corel... mostly for the
          WordPerfect word processor since Adobe
          currently has no word processor per se
          other than what is built-in to PageMaker, etc. Of course, the last article I read
          quoted Corel officials as "denying" the
          Adobe takover reports:

          http://europe.cnnfn.com/digitaljam/n...es/126228.html

          Comment


          • #6
            Premiere RT is in there because no other realtime software was available at this time and in this price range.

            Lest we forget Ulead IS releasing an SDK for developing a realtime plugin for MediaStudio Pro 6.0 so this situation might not be for long if Matrox gets the message.

            Do I hear an e-mail campaign coming on? ;-))

            Dr. Mordrid

            Comment


            • #7
              Doc... just wondering about RT2000, now, since it's going to ship with Premiere RT. It sure would be a drag to find that Adobe was sliding off into la-la land with the RT2000 married to it, at the outset. Of course, if Dvorak's correctly spotted the next Bill Gates victim, and Adobe ended up as part of the MS software cartel, then maybe by 2001 Premiere might be compatible with the Microsoft Hal 9000.

              "Hal! Open the pod bay door!"
              "I'm sorry, Dave, but I can't do that."

              Comment

              Working...
              X