Site's back (sort of)

[This_Idiot]

It's true. I can go to Haig and his support crew whenever I have a technical question and they'll do their best to get a response back to me ASAP.

Brian, yes, I deliberately picked 1024*768 since I'm aiming the site at a technically advanced reader who will be running that minimum resolution as a matter of course. If I was aiming at a family readership then I'd have dropped back to 800*600 or (possibly) done some trick scripting.

Caught me on the meta tags tho, I imported them from an old version of the page and didn't even look at them

[Ant]

Not wanting to nit pick but wouldn't an easier solution be to keep a backup of your data yourself rather than relying on a web host?

<font face="Verdana, Arial, Helvetica" size="2">Originally posted by This_Idiot:
Ideally I'd like the same info hosted on two different networks so that I can always recover from server failures(that's experience for you)

</font>

[Brian Ellis]

Well done, Chris!

2 minor comments:

The banner heading presupposes viewing at 1024 x 768, I believe

Your keywords do not seem to include Marvel or RT-2000?????

------------------
Brian (the terrible)

[This_Idiot]

To be honest, I don't think this is really the time to point fingers. I've always kept a copy of the site on my own machines until a hardware failure over christmas. Yep, I should have downloaded the whole damned thing again. But I didn't.

Just goes to prove the old adage, If you want to rely on something, make sure you do it all yourself !