If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
The main selling point of the 845D chipset was that although performance wasn't quite as good as the RIMM alternative it was so much cheaper.
With DDR RAM prices increasing and still on their way up there really isn't a great deal to save by going DDR over RIMM.
That being said, it looks like a nice chipset, it will be nice & stable like 95% of Intel chipset's and should be every potential P4 owner's first choice rather than the 845 SDRAM chipset.
I'll stick to my RIMM solution, but the DDR one certainly looks nice.
It cost one penny to cross, or one hundred gold pieces if you had a billygoat.
Trolls might not be quick thinkers but they don't forget in a hurry, either
Although the P4X266A and SiS 645 chipsets are both faster than the i845 with DDR SDRAM, neither chipset has such a stable following of platforms as the i845. We've been working on a P4X266/ P4X266A roundup alongside the i845 DDR roundup and the maturity of the boards is like night and day; the i845 platforms are much more stable, especially when operated with all memory banks populated.
Northwood seems to match the clock for clock speed of the paolomino in some situations, and it's clocked much higher... AMD will have some tough competition to fear if they can't switch at least partly to 0.13 micron within the next 3-6 months (is my guess).
"Given the option between DDR and Rambus, I'd pick DDR without a second thought... its superior in almost every way, and a lot cheaper"
Then why doesn't the DDR based benchmarks against RAMBUS show this?
A lot cheaper is in the eye of the beholder, DDR RAM has been slowly raising in price over the past few weeks, there isn't a major difference in price now.
It cost one penny to cross, or one hundred gold pieces if you had a billygoat.
Trolls might not be quick thinkers but they don't forget in a hurry, either
Originally posted by rylan Given the option between DDR and Rambus, I'd pick DDR without a second thought... its superior in almost every way, and a lot cheaper.
Even more than that I'd go with an Athlon, since the P4 is kind of a joke anyway.
A joke in what way ?
Fear, Makes Wise Men Foolish !
incentivize transparent paradigms
Originally posted by Paulr "Given the option between DDR and Rambus, I'd pick DDR without a second thought... its superior in almost every way, and a lot cheaper"
Then why doesn't the DDR based benchmarks against RAMBUS show this?
They do more than show this. Again: the incredible bandwidth provided by the Intel 850 chipset are due to IT HAVING DUAL CHANNELS and thus doubling the Rambus bandwidth.
So the crazy mem throughout you see on i850 based mobos is Intels achievement and not Rambus'. And the single channel DDR platforms already get a lot more than half the i850, besides having a much lower latency.
IF Intel produced a DUAL CHANNEL DDR266 platform, that one would put the i850 to shame.
But that's one of RDRAM's greatest advantages! It's easy *and* cheap to make a dual-channel configuration. Dual-channel DDR is harder to design/manufacture and will hence be more expensive.
Comment