If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
5 megapixel camera not good enough? How does 14MP sound?
5 megapixel camera not good enough? How does 14MP sound?
Yup, Kodak has just produced the world's first 14MegaPixel digital camera....each picture occupies a nifty 8MB but thankfully the damn thing has a Firewire connection...all I can say to this is !
It's not overkill. At 10 megapixels, you're slowly approaching the quality of analog photos. Maybe you want to have a poster of your latest shot - try that with your 800x600 digicam
Now it only has to become MUCH cheaper. Print services, too.
my old 2.1 MP Kodak takes 1790x1290 or so, prints out perfectly on a A4 laser, looks better than an enlarged print in most cases. Not talking professional development of course, but then I'm not talking about professional costs either. 14 MP is for professionals who want to shoot posters, otherwise it's just madness!
Bring it on!
Look, I know you think the world of me, that's understandable, you're only human, but it's not nice to call somebody "Vain"!
my old 2.1 MP Kodak takes 1790x1290 or so, prints out perfectly on a A4 laser, looks better than an enlarged print in most cases. Not talking professional development of course, but then I'm not talking about professional costs either. 14 MP is for professionals who want to shoot posters, otherwise it's just madness!
You're tricking yourself. A 3MP camera isn't much good past 5"x 8" prints, if that. Just figure 300 dpi is pretty good. Your 1790x1290 (2.3MP, so an overshoot there) would be about 5" x 4" at 300dpi.
Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
I agree with Agent31 that at present 'we' don't need 14MP considering present storage methods at reasonable prices. Just think how fast a sony mavica would fill up its 140MB discs. However, I know a ton of graphic designers and professional photographers that would love this. If you've ever had to do graphic design from a client's 800x600 digital shots you know their pain. Plus now you can say, I want to use that small piece of the picture on this layout and have it not suck.....
Wikipedia and Google.... the needles to my tangent habit.
________________________________________________
That special feeling we get in the cockles of our hearts, Or maybe below the cockles, Maybe in the sub-cockle area, Maybe in the liver, Maybe in the kidneys, Maybe even in the colon, We don't know.
Guys we are talking about vas majority of users here. Not graphical designers. Not photo artists. About Jon Doe who buys the camera to take pics of his new car, baby or maybe trip to Brazil.
Anyway, its great to see how easy for them is to increase the CDD chip resolution, think that soon there will be no oldschool hardcore photographers screaming "analog is still the king!" left. Heh
Comment