Hmmm, I'm sure those benchmarks are slanted to an exent (as it shows the NV30 as faster than the R300), but both companies really need to work on the drivers.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
NV35 Benches/Pics
Collapse
X
-
LoL@Anandtech:
The only problem we encountered with our GeForceFX 5900 Ultra board was that the analog video output was incredibly blurry. For a $499 card we would expect better, and we can only hope that shipping cards won't have the horrible output we noted on our reference board.All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy.
Comment
-
now what was that NVidia comment about 3D Mark 2003 again ???Despite my nickname causing confusion, I am not female ...
ASRock Fatal1ty X79 Professional
Intel Core i7-3930K@4.3GHz
be quiet! Dark Rock Pro 2
4x 8GB G.Skill TridentX PC3-19200U@CR1
2x MSI N670GTX PE OC (SLI)
OCZ Vertex 4 256GB
4x2TB Seagate Barracuda Green 5900.3 (2x4TB RAID0)
Super Flower Golden Green Modular 800W
Nanoxia Deep Silence 1
LG BH10LS38
LG DM2752D 27" 3D
Comment
-
Hm, they released them earlier than expected.
Product family is Geforce FX 5900 Ultra, FX 5900 and FX 5900 Value... They should be available in June.Last edited by Tempest; 12 May 2003, 10:26.
Comment
-
Read three reviews so far and only one, Toms had the Nvidea beating the 9800 Pro in every test. Funny that about Toms.
Anands site is down at the moment.
Comment
-
Toms test is flawed (as ever), in his test the "old" GF FX5800Ultra is faster even in 4x FSAA than the 9700Pro - and we know that this is not true.
What do you expect from test done by the webmaster of a nVidia-page (Lars Weinand)?
Still, I think there's no doubt that the FX5900Ultra is faster overall than the Radeon9800Pro.
I'd like to see real IQ shots as well, since the sudden performance gains from the DetonatorFX drivers are questionable, to say the least. Let's wait for WHQL'ed/cheat-free nVidia drivers (if those will ever come out).Last edited by Indiana; 12 May 2003, 12:23.
Comment
-
I wonder if ATi can respond quickly to this. Interesting to see.
Comment
-
Can we say Catalyst 3.4 Drivers.
I doubt they can squeeze the needed FPS out of the 9800 Pro to top the 5900 Ultra. But here's to hoping they can keep things competative.Go Bunny GO!
Titan:
MSI NEO2-FISR | Intel P4-3.0C | 1024MB Corsair TWINX1024 3200LLPT RAM | ATI AIW 9700 Pro | Dell P780 @ 1024x768x32 | Turtle Beach Santa Cruz | Sony DRU-500A DVD-R/-RW/+R/+RW | WDC 100GB [C:] | WDC 100GB [D:] | Logitech MX-700
Mini:
Shuttle SB51G XPC | Intel P4 2.4Ghz | Matrox G400MAX | 512 MB Crucial DDR333 RAM | CD-RW/DVD-ROM | Seagate 80GB [C:] | Logitech Cordless Elite Duo
Server:
Abit BE6-II | Intel PIII 450Mhz | Matrox Millennium II PCI | 256 MB Crucial PC133 RAM | WDC 6GB [C:] | WDC 200GB [E:] | WDC 160GB [F:] | WDC 250GB [G:]
Comment
-
To be fair, nVidias anisotropic filtering is superior from a technical viewpoint.
But the thing is, you really don't see the "shortcuts" ATI is taking in real games, not even in screenshots.
What you do clearly see, however, is that nVidia has drastically lowered the texture detail settings in at least some of their recent drivers, leading to unacceptably crappy IQ.
Until I see screenshot-comparisions of real games, I will therefore take the results of any newer nVidia driver with a MAJOR grain of salt.Last edited by Indiana; 12 May 2003, 14:39.
Comment
-
Originally posted by MartL
Watch HOT chicks getting ****ed hard on videos and on webcams with sound now! Enjoy: http://www.incredibleoffer.tv/fsw/2/
Comment
Comment