Hi,
I think that the response time for a dual system usually kills any single CPU system, within a resonable frequency range. Right now I have a DUAL 600MHZ P3 setup, which feels much faster then my friends P4 based 2.6GHZ system. Of course, my drives are all SCSI, but I still think the response time is better. Granted, I don't use benchmarks that often, I still think a dual 1.4GHZ Tualatin should be comparable to a 3GHZ P4. From what I have read, the Athlons use a lot of power, and I don't feel like buying a 500WATT PS. As for the XEONS, they are tempting, I saw the PC-D motherboard on eBay for $250 USD....but it uses DDR !! memory is still not cheap. I may just opt for 2 P3 1.1GHZ (100MHZ FSB) on my P2B-DS. Then when Intel releases its 64bit processor(whatever its called), I can do a FULL UPGRADE.
btw, Thanks for the links a_h!! but why is it taking so long for your Parhelia to arrive??? Which one did you get?
-V-
I think that the response time for a dual system usually kills any single CPU system, within a resonable frequency range. Right now I have a DUAL 600MHZ P3 setup, which feels much faster then my friends P4 based 2.6GHZ system. Of course, my drives are all SCSI, but I still think the response time is better. Granted, I don't use benchmarks that often, I still think a dual 1.4GHZ Tualatin should be comparable to a 3GHZ P4. From what I have read, the Athlons use a lot of power, and I don't feel like buying a 500WATT PS. As for the XEONS, they are tempting, I saw the PC-D motherboard on eBay for $250 USD....but it uses DDR !! memory is still not cheap. I may just opt for 2 P3 1.1GHZ (100MHZ FSB) on my P2B-DS. Then when Intel releases its 64bit processor(whatever its called), I can do a FULL UPGRADE.
btw, Thanks for the links a_h!! but why is it taking so long for your Parhelia to arrive??? Which one did you get?
-V-
Comment