Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

21" monitor choice

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    I've got an NEC FE950 19 inch. It's nice and it's even got top and bottom convergence control as well which is useful. Overall I would give it more marks out of ten than my Vision Master Pro 512.
    Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
    Weather nut and sad git.

    My Weather Page

    Comment


    • #32
      I think I'll order a mitsubishi 2115e, it doesn't have dual inputs but it does seem the better monitor

      Comment


      • #33
        Well they do manufacture the best tubes after the Trinitron. I guess peopel like Eizo now uses Mitsu tubes for their screens as Trinitron below 21" are gone
        System : ASUS A8N SLI premium, Athlon 64X2 3800+, 2Gb, T7K500 320Gb SATAII, T7K250 250Gb SATAII, T7K250 250Gb ATA133, Nec ND-3520, Plextor PX130A, SB Audigy 2, Sapphire Radeon X800 GTO, 24" Dell 2407WFP.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by az
          Kurt, I didn't see you were talking about an LCD. You won't damage your eyes with a cheap LCD, and Acer LCDs are fine.

          And yes, you pay too much for Sony LCDs, as well as for EIZO LCDs.

          AZ
          oops, sorry, I forgot to mention it

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Wombat
            Nobody was talking about LCDs here. I have no idea about Sony LCDs. But for tubes, definitely Sony.
            Well, Marshmallowman mentioned a 18.1 LCD it in the post I replied to.

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by PAugustin
              Well they do manufacture the best tubes after the Trinitron. I guess peopel like Eizo now uses Mitsu tubes for their screens as Trinitron below 21" are gone
              AFAIK Mitsubishi has licensed the Trinitron technology from Sony and added their grain of salt.

              Comment


              • #37
                Its quite nice, 1600x1200@85 is quite easy on the eyes, and it does have dual inputs BNC and hd15, something I have not read on there site or on anyreview?

                1280x1024@100hz is very crisp, I'm happy

                An 18" LCD would have been nice, and I have tried my best to justify it to myself, but 20" viewable for half the price is something I could not resist.

                I better crank up mouse acceleration, my mouse area is only good for 2/3 of the screen

                Comment


                • #38
                  Good to know you're happy with it
                  System : ASUS A8N SLI premium, Athlon 64X2 3800+, 2Gb, T7K500 320Gb SATAII, T7K250 250Gb SATAII, T7K250 250Gb ATA133, Nec ND-3520, Plextor PX130A, SB Audigy 2, Sapphire Radeon X800 GTO, 24" Dell 2407WFP.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Marshmallowman
                    Its quite nice, 1600x1200@85 is quite easy on the eyes, and it does have dual inputs BNC and hd15, something I have not read on there site or on anyreview?

                    1280x1024@100hz is very crisp, I'm happy

                    An 18" LCD would have been nice, and I have tried my best to justify it to myself, but 20" viewable for half the price is something I could not resist.

                    I better crank up mouse acceleration, my mouse area is only good for 2/3 of the screen
                    1600*1200@85Hz is probably the recommended resolution. It's quite small though, even on a 21". 1280 is easier on the eyes -but a bit wasted on such a big screen. Maybe 1400*1050...

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      BNC if I were you I'd use it if it's got it. You'd probably see a differance.
                      Chief Lemon Buyer no more Linux sucks but not as much
                      Weather nut and sad git.

                      My Weather Page

                      Comment

                      Working...
                      X