Everyone is fuXx0r3d because in moving from 130nm to 90nm process the normal paradigm of easy automatic scaling didn't hold. That is why PresHott is borked. AMD also saw this and didn't go to too much longer pipelines. They face the same problems going to 90nm. They are using SOI to help with this but there is still the leakage.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Intel finaly goes for a big change
Collapse
X
-
[size=1]D3/\/7YCR4CK3R
Ryzen: Asrock B450M Pro4, Ryzen 5 2600, 16GB G-Skill Ripjaws V Series DDR4 PC4-25600 RAM, 1TB Seagate SATA HD, 256GB myDigital PCIEx4 M.2 SSD, Samsung LI24T350FHNXZA 24" HDMI LED monitor, Klipsch Promedia 4.2 400, Win11
Home: M1 Mac Mini 8GB 256GB
Surgery: HP Stream 200-010 Mini Desktop,Intel Celeron 2957U Processor, 6 GB RAM, ADATA 128 GB SSD, Win 10 home ver 22H2
Frontdesk: Beelink T4 8GB
-
Originally posted by DentyCracker
Everyone is fuXx0r3d because in moving from 130nm to 90nm process the normal paradigm of easy automatic scaling didn't hold. That is why PresHott is borked. AMD also saw this and didn't go to too much longer pipelines. They face the same problems going to 90nm. They are using SOI to help with this but there is still the leakage.
220, 180, 150, 130, 90nm have all presented new and different challenges.Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
Comment
-
You guys crack me up....ROFL!!!!!
I wish I could say more but Wombat is correct in saying that nothing scales that easy. I see it all day long in a Site running 180, 150, 130, 90nm all at once. There's never a dull day in Process Integration."Never interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself"
Comment
-
OK......Someone "Biatch Slap" some sense into the Marketing Idiots!!!! Arrrrrr!!!!
Matrox, Intel, etc.. does it matter whose Marketing Idiots they are......ROFL!!!!"Never interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself"
Comment
-
OK let me rephrase, (though it is essentially the same thing). This time they have not solved the problems brought about by the smaller process before the processors got to market. Seeing as most people only see the end result, the statement is true (ok except for automatic).[size=1]D3/\/7YCR4CK3R
Ryzen: Asrock B450M Pro4, Ryzen 5 2600, 16GB G-Skill Ripjaws V Series DDR4 PC4-25600 RAM, 1TB Seagate SATA HD, 256GB myDigital PCIEx4 M.2 SSD, Samsung LI24T350FHNXZA 24" HDMI LED monitor, Klipsch Promedia 4.2 400, Win11
Home: M1 Mac Mini 8GB 256GB
Surgery: HP Stream 200-010 Mini Desktop,Intel Celeron 2957U Processor, 6 GB RAM, ADATA 128 GB SSD, Win 10 home ver 22H2
Frontdesk: Beelink T4 8GB
Comment
-
OH and yes, marketing needs several BIATCH SLAPS for spouting bullshit, but then that's what they do.[size=1]D3/\/7YCR4CK3R
Ryzen: Asrock B450M Pro4, Ryzen 5 2600, 16GB G-Skill Ripjaws V Series DDR4 PC4-25600 RAM, 1TB Seagate SATA HD, 256GB myDigital PCIEx4 M.2 SSD, Samsung LI24T350FHNXZA 24" HDMI LED monitor, Klipsch Promedia 4.2 400, Win11
Home: M1 Mac Mini 8GB 256GB
Surgery: HP Stream 200-010 Mini Desktop,Intel Celeron 2957U Processor, 6 GB RAM, ADATA 128 GB SSD, Win 10 home ver 22H2
Frontdesk: Beelink T4 8GB
Comment
Comment