I bought an X2 recently (had a thread here a couple of weeks ago) but I've been busy so I haven't even had time to open it up yet. From everything I've read though. X2s don't consume much more power than a single core A64 and still less than Intel's offerings.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ULi M1695 - The next SiS 735?
Collapse
X
-
X2 are a great idea, but they still are too expensive for what they offer. There´s still not much software out there to really use the 2nd core. They are a great upgrade path for socket 939 within a year or so, when they´ll become much cheaper.
Maybe because of the lower voltage, they are rated the same wattage as a venice core running the same speed - around 89W for the 3800+, if I´m correct. They appear to be very overclockable, also - some people with a Dual-Sata2 managed to overclock the cores to 2500Mhz with only 0,05v increase.
Definitly AMD still has the upper hand...
Comment
-
Comment
-
I got here a Venice 3200+ OEM for 146€, taxes included. It´s running just fine at 2450Mhz@245 HTT, that should be something between a 3800+ and a 4000+. Not bad for a sub-150€ CPU and a budget 70€ board
My previous CPU, a Athlon XP 2600+ thunderbird also costed around 150€ 2,5 years ago, and it certainly did its job @ 2200Mhz.
And of course, the king of kings of 150€ CPU´s of all times: the mighty Celeron 300A@450Mhz on a Abit BX6
I usually wait for these good deals to show up. That´s why this motherboard is just so adequate.Last edited by Nuno; 8 November 2005, 17:54.
Comment
-
Comment
Comment