Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

G400-processor combinations

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • G400-processor combinations

    I heard somewhere that the G400 is slower when used in combination with a Celeron-CPU. Is this true?

    What about the G400 in combination with AMD-CPU's?

    Greetings,
    Ferdie

  • #2
    No matter what gfx card you use, a celeron operating at the same frequency as a true intel will allways be slower.

    ------------------
    Athlon 500/MSI 6167/128mb/7200rpm/SB128/G400Max/Win98/RH6.0
    Athlon 800@1GHz/MSI 6167/256mb/7200rpm UD66/SB128/G400Max/Win98/Win2k/RH6.2/Be5

    Comment


    • #3
      Ferdie, Celerons don't have SSE so they'll be a tad slower. Same with K6-2 & 3's but better performing.

      Athlon's are in the same boat as P3's either using improved 3DNow or SSE.


      ------------------
      Designer of the first commercial Athlon mod.
      Anyone up for an Eclipse'd Athlon? Email me (epc@netdirect.net) for more information

      3000 mips, 1.172 gflops @ 900 mHz 1:3 latency
      CPUmark99 75
      FPU Winmark 4890

      3Dmark 99 Max (8x6 16, 16, triple) PD5.41
      8000
      15181

      "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

      "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

      Comment


      • #4
        Pentium 3 or Athlon is the way to go. For better overall compatibility go with the Pentium 3. For better overall speed go with the Athlon.

        Both are great, and both are not without there own problems.

        P3 700
        Athlon 700
        P3B-F
        Gigabyte 71x
        Pc133 128 in each
        Vortex2 in each
        2940U2W in each
        Plextor 8x2x20 in each
        Plextor 40Max in each
        IBM 18.2U2 in each
        USR v90 in each
        Intel 10/100 in each

        Comment


        • #5
          Really, I mustn't know what I'm doing wit an Athlon?!... Mus be the MB your using!

          ------------------
          Designer of the first commercial Athlon mod.
          Anyone up for an Eclipse'd Athlon? Email me (epc@netdirect.net) for more information

          3000 mips, 1.172 gflops @ 900 mHz 1:3 latency
          CPUmark99 75
          FPU Winmark 4890

          3Dmark 99 Max (8x6 16, 16, triple) PD5.41
          8000
          15181

          "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

          "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

          Comment


          • #6
            Actually, Celerons can be faster than equal speed P-IIs & P-IIIs for gaming when the game doesn't support SSE. The problem is that the G400 series seem to prefer higher speed processors. That means either spending lots of dough on an Intel processor, or going with an AMD. I've got three systems: one OC'd Celeron, and two OC'd P-IIIs. My next system is going to be an Athlon (counting the days now :0) And of course the G400MAX will migrate to that platform. The difference is that I'm spending $50 more for a 650 Athlon ($299 total) than I paid for a P-III 500 10 weeks ago, and $50 less than what I'd pay for a P-III 550E. (OK! I'll admit it! I just wanted to build an Athlon :^P)

            ------------------
            Oh NO!! My computers have started "multi-tasking" ME!!!
            <a href="http://www.gaijindesign.com/lawriemalen/jedi" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.gaijindesign.com/lawriemalen/jedi/yoda.jpg" width="285" height="123" border="0"><br>:: how jedi are you? ::</a>

            Comment

            Working...
            X