its interesting that with all this talk about v2 sli and tnt this and that and the g400 is slower that no one has mentioned which one looks better.are you sacrificing framerate at the expense of having greater visual quality thats what matrox is all about the g400 max will perform simialar to the the tnt/2's as well as look better i have had all the cards mentioned and the v3 and can tell you that the matrox looks better and performs similar now this is not counting evbm or the fact it can really do trilinear(unlike the ugly tnt dithering affect while using trilinear).as for unreal yes its performance is not whats expected (got to me too at first)but the tnt used to be the only choice for a competator to glide and the current d3d code for unreal is biased towards the tnt for know but tim sweeny(unreal programmer likes the card)wait till the new unreal patch with much improved d3d code as well as the new matrox drivers come out.install on a clean system then compare,give the matrox a chance to compete with the fully seasoned nvidia drivers.
although everyone could be a little more understanding around here
p.s. with heatsinks on all ram modules and a socket 370 cooler and fan on the core i can run 215/160 memory and core respectively on a
583 celeron and it aint bad for a oem g400 vanilla.when is the last time you seen a bottom of the pile card overclock that far stable.must be using good.really im impressed with the ram.
although everyone could be a little more understanding around here
p.s. with heatsinks on all ram modules and a socket 370 cooler and fan on the core i can run 215/160 memory and core respectively on a
583 celeron and it aint bad for a oem g400 vanilla.when is the last time you seen a bottom of the pile card overclock that far stable.must be using good.really im impressed with the ram.
Comment