To Unexplained

[SwAmPlAdY]

Excellent rebuttal Hugh.

SwAmPy

[KvHagedorn]

Wow, Hugh. I'm glad I have a copy of Webster's Third New Humongous Dictionary at hand here, otherwise I would be at a loss.



------------------
Kind Regards,

KvH

[Guyver]

Excellent Hugh!

Guyver

[Dualbuzz]

This is the last thing, Unexplained will post here. He told me, that he is offended by Hugh and you all, and that he will never even visit MURC. BTW, I think he is not so bad as you think (he even plans to buy a Matrox card

-------Unexplained last word-------

Let's talk again about an all-too-familiar subject: Hugh G Recshun and his spiteful short-sighted sermons. Some background is
in order: Hugh insists that courtesy and manners don't count for anything. This fraud, this lie, is just one among the thousands he
perpetrates. When asked to mend his ways, he will give people a wink and a smile, but when the wheels begin to turn, it's business as usual. It may seem senseless to say that the maladroit tone used by Hugh in his ramblings shows what kind of person he really is. Nevertheless, the position can be defended. I know that he frequently writes self-contradictory, nonsensical "sentences" that are actually just phrases or sentence fragments filled with grammatical, spelling, capitalization, and punctuation errors. You know that. But does he know we know that? Only Hugh can praise an institution that is as detestable and stuck-up as he himself. What are the lessons for us in this? First, it's that his propaganda machine grinds on and on. And second, to believe that the purpose of life is self-gratification is to deceive ourselves. You shouldn't take threats made by postmodernist testy boeotians too seriously.

Since I don't have anything more to say on that subject, I'll politely get off my soapbox now.

[The PIT]

Not meaning to be rude you mean it's really bullshit?
Correct me if I'm wrong.

[Hugh G Recshun]

I want to share with you a few of the tentative conclusions I've reached regarding Unexplained's anecdotes. And I stress the word "tentative," because the subject of what motivates Unexplained is tricky and complex. I want to share this with you because Unexplained's reason is not true reason. It does not seek the truth, but only devious answers, ignominious resolutions to conflicts. As I understand it, his intent is to prevent us from asking questions. Unexplained doesn't want the details checked. He doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts he presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of his "facts" are false. I recently heard him tell a bunch of people that women are crazed Pavlovian sex-dogs who will salivate at any object even remotely phallic in shape. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. While there are many impetuous boneheads, Unexplained is the most careless of the lot. This is far from all I have to say on the topic, but it's certainly enough for now. Just remember one thing: We should use our words to create understanding and progress, not hatred and division.


Hugh G.

[xortam]

I can't believe you're still at it. When are you guys going to get tired of playing with this new toy? I suppose as long as you've got a gullible audience.

[The PIT]

Shouldn't this be in the soap box anyway?

[Dualbuzz]

In general, if you don't like it, don't read it.

Secondly, when people on the thread ask for "the next chapter", we need to answer to their demand. I stopped, when, noone was interested anymore.

P.S. I don't know, why the thread wasn't moved to the soap box.

[Himself]

What's with all the purple prose?

I keep visualizing caligraphy and people in powdered wigs for some reason.

[Brian R.]

Sounds like the writing of a schizophrenic.

[The PIT]

I reckon it's unexplained in disguise boosting his alter ego.

[Dualbuzz]

This is the homepage of Unexplained "alter ego".
http://www-csag.cs.uiuc.edu/individual/pakin/complaint

[cjolley]

Nice nab.
I don't think that's it. Not enough details.
But you're on the right track.
chuck

[DuRaNgO]

What I offer here is an involved yet detached look at My shlong being too big's schemes. Perhaps time, further study, and more reflection will either modify or enrich the analysis offered here, but I would truly be surprised if My shlong stopped to communicate and share ideas with even one of the people he regularly attacks. One of the first facts we should face is that I am shocked and angered by My shlong's pouty disorderly improprieties. Such shameful conduct should never be repeated. Now that I've had time to think hard about his theories, my only question is this: Why? Why abandon the idea of universal principles and focus illegitimately on the particular? Today, we might have let him desecrate personal religious objects. Tomorrow, we won't. Instead, we will defy the international enslavement of entire peoples. Will someone please explain to me what it is in our lives that can possibly make someone convict me without trial, jury, or reading one complete paragraph of this letter?

My shlong should clarify his point, so people like you and me can tell what the heck he's talking about. Without clarification, My shlong's viewpoints sound lofty and include some emotionally charged actions but don't really seem to make any sense. It's not that I have anything against My Schlong in general. It's just that there is a format he should follow for his next literary endeavor. It involves a topic sentence and supporting facts. My shlong's wheelings and dealings are a public admission of his immaturity and insensitivity. Ergo, I'm sticking out my neck a bit in talking about My shlong's communications. It's quite likely he will try to retaliate against me for my telling you that prudence is no vice. Cowardice -- especially his prurient form of it -- is. In a nutshell, I wouldn't put it past My shlong being too big to overthrow the government and eliminate the money system.
jim



[This message has been edited by DuRaNgO (edited 04 August 2000).]