It's Coming....

[Liquid Snake]

LOL LAMF, what did you do to that picture??

[orangejulius]

Pros:
Cool looking, big interior, luxury features without additional price.

Cons:
No manual transmission, power somewhat disappointing, lacking refinement.
http://www.edmunds.com/newcars/2000/...gcoupe/lx.html

Cool looking? IMHO the front's rather pretentious and plasticky. :P For that kind of money, I'd rather get one of these.

LAMFDTK, LMAO!

[This message has been edited by orangejulius (edited 02 September 2000).]

[Rags]

OJ,

The Accord can't touch the Sebring in price. Unless you go with the 4 banger, then you are really not getting what you want, are ya?

Rags

[orangejulius]

Honda Accord Coupe 3.0 EX Coupe 2-Dr
2000 current market value: $22,628
1999 model: $18,592

Chrysler Sebring Coupe LX 2-Dr
2000 current market value: $18,667

Okay Rags, you're right. But why not get a '99 Honda for the same price as the '00 Chrysler?

Or if we're talking new cars only, wouldn't you say reliability alone is worth the extra $4K?

Buying a Honda's like buying a Matrox. You spend a little more for refinement.

[Brian R.]

I bought an Accord coupe V6 in February. Nice car. No stick either. Will trade in my Toyota as soon as the V6 comes out with a manual transmission.

(Lusting after a Prelude)

[This message has been edited by Brian R. (edited 02 September 2000).]

[Himself]

Rags,

We have winter most of the year, whatever gets on cars is black.

[Rags]

Look closely at Kruzin's car. His is not brand new. I believe it's a 97. Still, the price is lower than an accord.

Hey, the Accord is a nice automobile. I owned a '94 back in '94. It was a sweet ride until the motor locked up (two weeks, and 700 miles later). They are very well built, and the fit and finish is superior. But the price isn't justified, IMO. American automobiles, and other japanese makers are close enough now that their price isn't warranted, IMO. For example, you can drive a Mitsubishi Diamante for the same price as the Accord V6. And the Diamante is larger, has a better ride, and more features.

Rags

[Joel]

Mine may not be much to look at. It may have 140,000 miles on it. It may not even ride as smooth as it use too. But it does have one good advantage over the cars y'all are talking about. No car note.

Joel

[This message has been edited by Joel (edited 02 September 2000).]

[paulcs]

Kruzin posts a picture of an attractive woman in shorts and all we can talk about is his car. We must be getting old.

Paul
paulcs@flashcom.net

[Rags]

No, we are people in good taste at times

[Riddek]

I like 'em fast with a sleek body and curves in all the right places. (what? I was referring to the car!)

[This message has been edited by Riddek (edited 03 September 2000).]

[This message has been edited by Riddek (edited 03 September 2000).]

[Livius]

C'mon now, has it arrived? Please stop this women/cars conversation. It's turning me off... Please... Is IT there? I mean the GREEN thing, the DOUBLE-HEADED thing, the tiny, slim, shady thing...

HAS IT ARRIVED?

[LAMFDTK]

I was wondering what kind of lawnmower has been used on the grass? I have a 5 horse Sears rear bagger. Its the S3 Trio of lawnmowers.

[Riddek]

C'mon now, LAMFDTK.
Let's try to be serious and talk about the important issue at hand. Like the Matrox G800 Fusion cards that power the monitors in the space ship that landed behind Kruzin's car and burned the mini crop circle in the lawn. I mean, really now!

[Pace]

LAMF is that mower from the All-Grass Products range or Professional Cutting Istruments?


Paul.