Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Anandtech review
Collapse
X
-
HAHAHA this is hilarious. The first benchmark he shows is villagemark, to "see whether Parhelia suffers by not having early occlusion tech" Somehow, he is able to draw a conclusion from this data, although he has shown no other benchmarks yet!!! He has NOTHING to compare it too!!!
Comment
-
Seem to be using new drivers than Toms. Still ouch though.
Comment
-
i am VERY dissapointed by the UT2003 scores the 8500LE is as fast as the P, and costs 300$ less it makes ~60FPS at 1024x768x32 in one and 54FPS at the the same resolution in another level. i dont see how one could possible play UT2003 on three screens with ~20FPS averageLast edited by thop; 25 June 2002, 09:17.no matrox, no matroxusers.
Comment
-
Originally posted by thop
i am VERY dissapointed by the UT2003 scores the 8500LE is as fast as the P, and costs 300$ less
I'm very dissapointed too as UT2003 concernsP4 2,4@2,6 AsusP4T-533 C 512 mb PC 1066 Quantum Atlas 10KII SCSI ATI R9700
Comment
-
Oh dear
I've been eating hat thinking that the Parhella was actually fast ....
Unfortunately, It just isn't competing well in areas that it should do well in. And this is against cards with 128-bit memory buses and less sophisticated cores.
I wasn't expecting a GF4 killer, but this is a joke.80% of people think I should be in a Mental Institute
Comment
Comment