If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Originally posted by Kruzin
you're selling fewer cards than ever, and new customers are at an all-time low...
not sure about that one, my friend...
OFFICIAL EX- EMPLOYEE
<font size="1">"So now I'm dreaming<br>For myself I'm understanding <br>Performing there, one hundred thousand fans would gather one and all <br>And so decided, we could rule it all if we should <br>Dance all away across the greatest city in the nether world..."<p>- Central Park 09/24/03</font>
Originally posted by ex-SalesSoup not sure about that one, my friend...
Probably true that there are more units sold but, if I understand correctly, they are mostly going to OEM / Business customers, not (generally) the type of person who would come here. The majority of new users are, most likely, employees of a large company with an internal IS department, to fix their problems and are not hardware geeks . So new customer numbers in the general idea, individually purchased like a home user not a corporate user, is most likely at an all time low. Matrox seems to be focusing on specialty markets where there is more money but a smaller demographic (number of customers). Remember customers are not the same as users; IBM is a customer with thousands of users, employees.
Also seeing that Matrox is no longer bashing about in the gamming market, I would not be surprised if new memberships here does stay low for a while. Well, at least until an ultra cool gamming (G800 ) comes kicking and screaming to the surface.
Originally posted by Duty Probably true that there are more units sold but...
Basically, Kruzin is right.
From a certain point of view.
Jeff:
Fair enough. However, according to what's happening around here as of late, it looks to me like things are only going to get better (in terms of sales).
<font size="1">"So now I'm dreaming<br>For myself I'm understanding <br>Performing there, one hundred thousand fans would gather one and all <br>And so decided, we could rule it all if we should <br>Dance all away across the greatest city in the nether world..."<p>- Central Park 09/24/03</font>
So get on the phone to those corporates showing them how much more productive I'd be with more than one screen... please?
Chuck lots of studies re. multimonitor working (and about how cheap screens are too) at the business sector.
If dualhead was part of our corporate "standard" infrastructure (rented from compaq for >100,000 desktops & laptops), I'd be very happy, and I;m sure you would be too (if the dualhead was from Matrox). As it is, outside of the corporate treasury where I enjoyed 5-screen working (2 on a G450 in a desktop, and 3 on a Reuters box), no-one uses more than one monitor (and they give us pretty crappy ones at that...)
Oh: and Soupy - until (unless) Matrox starts making mobile parts, you're gonna lose out on about 70% of the business market. Having thought about it, here (Shell) we have probably 70-80% laptops and only the remainder as desktops. And most of those laptops are connected to a docking station for most of the time, but run locked down win2k, so the ability to use the laptop screen AND the monitor independently at the same time is not there (would be I guess on the ATi Rage chipset under Win9x or WinXP...)
Originally posted by GNEP So get on the phone to those corporates showing them how much more productive I'd be with more than one screen... please?
Chuck lots of studies re. multimonitor working (and about how cheap screens are too) at the business sector.
If dualhead was part of our corporate "standard" infrastructure (rented from compaq for >100,000 desktops & laptops), I'd be very happy, and I;m sure you would be too (if the dualhead was from Matrox). As it is, outside of the corporate treasury where I enjoyed 5-screen working (2 on a G450 in a desktop, and 3 on a Reuters box), no-one uses more than one monitor (and they give us pretty crappy ones at that...)
When I get my teeth into the many tasks and projects I'll be working on, I'll definitely make sure to focus on convincing corporate users that multi-display is essential. It's high up on my to-do list.
OFFICIAL EX- EMPLOYEE
<font size="1">"So now I'm dreaming<br>For myself I'm understanding <br>Performing there, one hundred thousand fans would gather one and all <br>And so decided, we could rule it all if we should <br>Dance all away across the greatest city in the nether world..."<p>- Central Park 09/24/03</font>
Originally posted by GNEP Oh: and Soupy - until (unless) Matrox starts making mobile parts, you're gonna lose out on about 70% of the business market. Having thought about it, here (Shell) we have probably 70-80% laptops and only the remainder as desktops. And most of those laptops are connected to a docking station for most of the time, but run locked down win2k, so the ability to use the laptop screen AND the monitor independently at the same time is not there (would be I guess on the ATi Rage chipset under Win9x or WinXP...)
We do have docking station solutions (even MMS boards can fit, to offer quad output), but I don't see us going the mobile route in the near future.
OFFICIAL EX- EMPLOYEE
<font size="1">"So now I'm dreaming<br>For myself I'm understanding <br>Performing there, one hundred thousand fans would gather one and all <br>And so decided, we could rule it all if we should <br>Dance all away across the greatest city in the nether world..."<p>- Central Park 09/24/03</font>
These are generally just docking stations with drives etc - not the capacity for expansion boards unfortunately. Shame about no laptop parts - this one I'm using now manages to go a bit fuzzy everytime I move the mouse... ( at ATi/Compaq).
Glad to hear the convincing of corporate people is high on the to-do list
wow... kruzin got really really pessemistic in my abscense...
"And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz
Originally posted by ex-SalesSoup Goes to show you that we've reached a point where the quality of the product no longer exhibits problems that need fixing!
Actually, if you look, he's installing a G550 on a K7 system. So, nice old hardware. He got a G550, I told him how to fix it. Had he gotten a Parhelia, I would have told him to return it.
Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
Comment