If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Why is the G400 so unfriendly to slower cpus? (not looking to get flamed)
Yup, designed to go in new computers. Not as upgrades. By far their biggest market is for OEMs, ie. brand spankin' new speedy systems.
Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox
Again, the glass is half full. It's not CPU limited.
It's very scalable.
It's more future proof.
And if you're a maniac who feels the need to upgrade processors the minute the CPU you've been drooling over falls within your price range, like a certain person who occupies the same space as I do, it's the perfect board. If I could resist upgrading videocards every five minutes, it might actually save me some money.
Fast is good.
Paul
paulcs@flashcom.net
[This message has been edited by paulcs (edited 11 January 2000).]
Well, if you're looking for a technical explanation, isn't triangle-setup a large part of it?
Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.
Comment