Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why is the G400 so unfriendly to slower cpus? (not looking to get flamed)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why is the G400 so unfriendly to slower cpus? (not looking to get flamed)



    ------------------
    ***TRUST IN YOUR TECHNOLUST***
    <A HREF="http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
    " TARGET=_blank>http://jediphoenix.iscool.net/
    </A>

  • #2
    Because Matrox built the card for today's harware (and included the scalability for tomorrow's), not last years hardware or the year before...
    Core2 Duo E7500 2.93, Asus P5Q Pro Turbo, 4gig 1066 DDR2, 1gig Asus ENGTS250, SB X-Fi Gamer ,WD Caviar Black 1tb, Plextor PX-880SA, Dual Samsung 2494s

    Comment


    • #3
      Yup, designed to go in new computers. Not as upgrades. By far their biggest market is for OEMs, ie. brand spankin' new speedy systems.
      Lady, people aren't chocolates. Do you know what they are mostly? Bastards. Bastard coated bastards with bastard filling. But I don't find them half as annoying as I find naive, bubble-headed optimists who walk around vomiting sunshine. -- Dr. Perry Cox

      Comment


      • #4
        Again, the glass is half full. It's not CPU limited.

        It's very scalable.

        It's more future proof.

        And if you're a maniac who feels the need to upgrade processors the minute the CPU you've been drooling over falls within your price range, like a certain person who occupies the same space as I do, it's the perfect board. If I could resist upgrading videocards every five minutes, it might actually save me some money.

        Fast is good.

        Paul
        paulcs@flashcom.net

        [This message has been edited by paulcs (edited 11 January 2000).]

        Comment


        • #5
          Well, if you're looking for a technical explanation, isn't triangle-setup a large part of it?
          Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

          Comment


          • #6
            Hey, it worked great on my iCeleron 337a(75x4.5). And that's not really fast anymore. But it is better on my 525 (75x7)

            ------------------
            AsusP2B ,iCeleron525(7x75), 128megs PC100, G40032megSH, Yamaha PCI sound, 2 small HD's, 42X Sony CDrom and 98SE w/shutdown patch, PD 5.41 w/Turbo MCD and beta ICD

            AMD XP2100+, 512megs DDR333, ATI Radeon 8500, some other stuff.

            Comment


            • #7
              Stop whining and get a faster computer But seriously ManojM, it's unfriendly because slower CPU's tend to be more annoying and repetitive...

              ------------------
              Celeron 300A@464 2.0V, Abit BH6 G400 16meg DH@150/200, Western Digital Expert 18gig, Ricoh mp7040A, Pioneer 6X DVD slot load, Motorola Cable Modem w/DEC ethernet card, Soundblaster Live Value Ver. 2, Viewsonic GT 775


              Celeron 566@877 1.8V, 256meg generic PC-100 RAM (running at CAS2) Abit BH6, G400 16meg DH@150/200, Western Digital Expert 18gig, Ricoh mp7040A(morphed to mp7060A) Pioneer 6X DVD slot load, Motorola Cable Modem w/DEC ethernet card, Soundblaster Live Value Ver. 2, Viewsonic GT 775

              Comment

              Working...
              X