Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What are your UT benchmarks?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    All done in 32 bit colour w/High Detail Textures and High Detail Skins.

    800x600
    2937 frames rendered in 53.75 seconds. Min 42.59 Max 78.39 Avg 54.62 fps.
    1024x768
    2937 frames rendered in 53.91 seconds. Min 42.57 Max 75.24 Avg 54.45 fps.

    Vsync disabled
    64 megs of ram

    ------------------
    Athlon 500MHz @ 750MHz 1/3
    G400 32 meg Dual-Head Vanilla @ 160.2/200.25 (400.5, 2.5/2.0/2.5)

    Athlon 500MHz @ 750MHz 1/3
    G400 32 meg Dual-Head Vanilla @ 160.2/200.25 (400.5, 2.5/2.0/2.5)

    Comment


    • #17
      Hey

      Cel550 w/128mb and G400MAX(not oc'd)...
      with the settings the guy above posted... and MED/MED tex and skins...

      640x480x16 MIN=15,84 MAX=47,19 AVG=28,68
      800x600x16 MIN=18,08 MAX=44,65 AVG=28,66
      800x600x32 MIN=12,92 MAX=45,35 AVG=28,14
      1024x768x32 MIN=17,47 MAX=41,41 AVG=27,83

      can this be right? doesn't really matter what res or depth, runs almost just the same?
      <font size=1>Primary System: ASUS P4B533-E, Intel Pentium4 1.6A GHz, 512MB Samsung PC2700, Leadtek GF4 Ti4200 64MB, SB Audigy, 2xSeagate Barracuda IV 80GB, Pioneer DVD 106S, NEC CD-R 40/10/40, InWin Q500 Case w/ Enermax 353W PSU, Windows XP Pro, Samsung SyncMaster 753DFX.

      Secondary System: ECS K7S5A, Athlon XP 1600+, 256MB PC133, Asus GF2 GTS 32MB, Seagate Barracuda IV 20GB, Aopen HQ08 Case, Windows XP Pro.</font>

      Comment


      • #18
        Doesn't make much sense, does it? Your 1024x32 is as fast as 640x16. :/ Are you sure mindesiredframerate=0? It's the most important setting of all.
        P3@600 | Abit BH6 V1.01 NV | 256MB PC133 | G400MAX (EU,AGP2X) | Quantum Atlas 10K | Hitachi CDR-8330 | Diamond FirePort 40 | 3c905B-TX | TB Montego A3D(1) | IntelliMouse Explorer | Iiyama VisionMaster Pro 17 | Win2K/NT4

        Comment


        • #19
          Gatto, It's not your MB. It may if you change your L2 to 1:3 latency!
          "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

          "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

          Comment


          • #20
            Ok... i dont think this applies here.. but i tried the BM w/ my 16meg agp millg200, 64meg ram, K6 233 OCD to 300

            my score on 800x600:
            min: 5.86
            max: 21.80
            avg: 11.39
            ?i think 2769f in 279 secs?

            lol.. try and beat that score..
            <font size="1">Gigabyte GA-6VXC7-4X MoBo
            VIA Apollo Pro 133a (694x/686A) chipset (4x agp, UDMA 66)
            Celeron II 733 CPU (coppermine 128)
            128meg (2x64) 133mhz SDRam
            Matrox Milleniumm G200 AGP 16 mb
            Creative Sound Blaster Live! 5.1 Digital model 0100 (MP3+, Gamer)
            Quantum LM 30 gig HD 7200 RPM UDMA 66
            Realtek 8029A NIC Card
            Optiquest V775 17" Monitor
            Actima 36X CD-Rom
            Advansys 510 SCSI Card (ISA, but good enuf for my burner)
            Yamaha 6416 CD-RW
            Windows 2000 (primary)
            Slackware Linux 9.0(secondary/emergency)</font>

            Comment


            • #21
              Using Scytale's settings, here's what I get:

              Asus P2B-F
              PII 400
              128m
              G400 32m Flex
              PD 5.27 drivers
              SBLive
              Win98

              Nothing O/C'ed.

              ave = 25.98

              Haig

              Comment


              • #22
                Hmmm somebody has an RT2000 it seems
                [size=1]D3/\/7YCR4CK3R
                Ryzen: Asrock B450M Pro4, Ryzen 5 2600, 16GB G-Skill Ripjaws V Series DDR4 PC4-25600 RAM, 1TB Seagate SATA HD, 256GB myDigital PCIEx4 M.2 SSD, Samsung LI24T350FHNXZA 24" HDMI LED monitor, Klipsch Promedia 4.2 400, Win11
                Home: M1 Mac Mini 8GB 256GB
                Surgery: HP Stream 200-010 Mini Desktop,Intel Celeron 2957U Processor, 6 GB RAM, ADATA 128 GB SSD, Win 10 home ver 22H2
                Frontdesk: Beelink T4 8GB

                Comment


                • #23
                  The overclocked front side bus appears to have benefits other than speeding up the the processor. Systems based upon PIII 450's overclocked to 630 MHz are pretty darn fast.

                  I've been shutting down the console before the demo starts. It would be nice if it just shut down by itself.

                  As expected, the 700+ Club members are putting up some pretty impressive numbers. I really think it's interesting that we've yet to determine a ceiling on G400 performance.

                  Paul
                  paulcs@flashcom.net

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    System 2

                    G400 Vanilla AGP 1x
                    PII 400@468 (4x117)
                    256 MB RAM
                    Turtle Beach Montego (Vortex 1)

                    I'm too tired to do a real thorough job.

                    800x600 16-bit Medium/Medium: 27.65
                    1024x768 16-bit Medium/Medium: 27.04

                    I'll think about how close those marks are tomorrow.

                    Paul
                    paulcs@flashcom.net

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Haig, you list that you are running "PD 5.27" drivers.

                      That must have been a Matrox only internal release. That was not released to the public, was it?

                      Why are you running that one vs. 5.3, or 5.41?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Hi Thunder,

                        The G400 that I have is part of the RT 2000 package. This is the display drivers that they support and it has no DX 7 optimizations at all.

                        Haig

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          All I get is a general protection fault when I try to run the timedemo...



                          Anyone with an idea??

                          Jord.

                          [This message has been edited by Jorden (edited 24 January 2000).]
                          Jordâ„¢

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            update to the latest patch if it doesn't work.

                            this is funny, i seem to be getting fps of about 21-23 on every setting. any ideas?

                            ------------------
                            ----------------
                            Pentium III 500@620
                            Soyo SY-6BA+4
                            128MB Corsair PC133 (soon to be 256MB)
                            IBM 34GXP 13GB, ATA-66
                            Pioneer 10x DVD
                            G400MAX at 150/200
                            Viewsonic PF790 19"
                            Sound Blaster Live! Platinum
                            Klipsch Promedia v.2-400
                            Supermicro SC-750A

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Greebe!

                              It is mobo to my knowledge that is limiting my
                              "Experiments" because in Fic`s homepage
                              they say that the bios is only to 800Mhz.
                              I hope the are Bullshitting me
                              Gonna try tonight `cos i got h-oda`s L2 program.

                              Is anyone else having this peculiar problem
                              that my post shows here in 2-day delay?
                              I think it`s my proxyserver that is causing the delay.

                              Godspeed to everyone

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Gatto, the FIC SD-!! (ICK) will only show upto 800 on POST... not that your cpu can't run higher on it! The early K7M BIOS's were limited to 800 too and I could still run my cpu at 850. Shame it was such a sucky MB... look at all the problems people have with them now!
                                H.ODA's proggy won't do you a bit of good until you can address the multiplier function! Think about it... if it won't boot at 850 with a 1:2 setting then how do you expect to set the multiplier higher than 800 if you can't address the L2 setting before bootup?
                                "Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss

                                "Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X