Originally posted by Cobos
...you can not have a modern nuke in any of those kinds of games... [they] would obliterate everything on the entire map considering the scale they are using. Which of course makes it a sort of pointless weapon
...you can not have a modern nuke in any of those kinds of games... [they] would obliterate everything on the entire map considering the scale they are using. Which of course makes it a sort of pointless weapon
The nukes in Westwood games (and Blizzard games too, it would seem) are just silly. They serve no purpose. They are mildly stronger than a hand machinegun. Sometimes it can even damage a vehicle, but only if you're very lucky. And we're talking about a direct hit, here. Spot on. Bulls eye. I mean, the missile chassis itself, without the warhead, should do more damage just penetrating the panzer of the tank.
Empire Earth also gave the nuke a try. Ofcourse, they don't develop much from the WW-II era and onwards, so even in the nano-age, you still have bombers with nukes hardly capable of taking out buildings.
Oh well, this ranting feels rather pointless, but what I'm trying to say is this:
If you're ever in the position that you're writing a RTS game, and you have the bright idea of adding nuclear weaponry; don't do it unless you're prepared to make it a weapon of mass destruction. WW/Blizz-nukes are pointless. Stop it!
Comment