Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

How long can M last with just 2d?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Guru and others:

    I know that those who know can't say anything and everyone else knows nothing, THAT was my entire point.

    I am just sick of being told to wait by people who know nothing and people who can't speak. There is no proof that matrox will ever re-enter the 3d performace market, apart from a few fleeting matrox interviews which I currently refuse to believe

    Give me proof when you tell me (or other people) to wait and I won't be so cross

    Now about it just being a video card: Yes, it is just a video card, but if it was as unimportant as you are making out, then why on earth have these forums and why bother debating me. Video cards (along with monitors) are the most important pieces of the computer.

    OmegaRED, It is not like I intend to get overly worked up about it in my daily life, but it is important to me and many others that there is:

    1) lots of competition in the video card market
    2) Matrox still exists to set the standard for 2d quality

    Now, about the needs of general computer users, Gum. Most low-end computers use onboard video, which is fast and good enough for what most people do. If matrox doesn't pull its head out of its butt, it will have its dinner eaten by onboard video.

    Now, what really works me up is that matrox would have been able to easily create a fairly decent 3d card (say G600) by using a 128bit ddr bus in the G550. They could have marketed the G550 and the G600 (say) with the G550 being the cheaper buisness solution and the G600 being the high end buisness solution. They could have developed and released this higher end card in the time they wasted developing headcasting.

    And, Guru, you sound like a script kiddie when you use call the geforce a GayFart and nVIDIA nVidiot. You can debate the various pro's and con's of video cards without such obvious bias. BTW, how is a matrox card any easier than any other card to set up. I have found Matrox cards, SiS onboard video, Nvidia cards (geforce, tnt, riva 128), Intel i740, s3 cards (Trio3d, virge, trio) all just as easy to setup. They all have problems from time to time, but they are ussually easy to fix.
    80% of people think I should be in a Mental Institute

    Comment


    • #32
      There is no way to provide "proof" that Matrox will re-enter the hard-core 3-D gaming market.
      All I can offer is my somewhat informed opinion that they will, and that time is closer than many think it is.
      Obviously, G550 is not the card that will do this, but like any modern company, they are in development stages of more than one product at any given time...so G550 does not represent 2+ years of work on their end. G550 is simply an improvement (albeit somewhat minor in many's perspective) over previous cards. There has been other technologies in development that will see the light of day "when they are ready" that will put Matrox back in the gaming limelight, just as G400 did when it was first released.
      If a user is not willing to wait for that time, then they are welcome to move on to whatever card they feel best suits them.
      Untill that time, I am happy to stick with Matrox for my 2D DualHead CAD work (G450 in my office machine), and my various home tasks (2D CAD, DVD, and moderate gaming on G550, and G400 in kids main school/game machine, and even a G200 in our tertiary rig).
      Last edited by Kruzin; 17 August 2001, 23:55.
      Core2 Duo E7500 2.93, Asus P5Q Pro Turbo, 4gig 1066 DDR2, 1gig Asus ENGTS250, SB X-Fi Gamer ,WD Caviar Black 1tb, Plextor PX-880SA, Dual Samsung 2494s

      Comment

      Working...
      X