Papal infallibility is probably the most misunderstood (esp. by protestants) dogma of Catholic faith. The Pope (any Pope) is a man and is acknowledged to be as fallible as any other man, in all ways, except one. The definition of the first Vatican Council (1869–70), established amid considerable controversy, states the conditions under which a pope may be said to have spoken infallibly, or ex cathedra (“from his chair†as supreme teacher). It is prerequisite that the pope intend to demand irrevocable assent from the entire church in some aspect of faith or morals.
In fact, papal infallibility has been very rarely invoked. I don't think the present one (if he is still alive) has ever done so. The one outstanding case over the past 200 years is the dogma of the Immaculate Conception. This is also greatly misunderstood. It does not apply to the conception of Jesus, but to the conception, by man, without original sin, of the Virgin Mary. The theory is that Mary could not have been impregnated by the Holy Spirit if her body were imbued with original sin.
In fact, papal infallibility has been very rarely invoked. I don't think the present one (if he is still alive) has ever done so. The one outstanding case over the past 200 years is the dogma of the Immaculate Conception. This is also greatly misunderstood. It does not apply to the conception of Jesus, but to the conception, by man, without original sin, of the Virgin Mary. The theory is that Mary could not have been impregnated by the Holy Spirit if her body were imbued with original sin.
Comment