silver wrench
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Are you in the 98% or 2%?
Collapse
X
-
Orange hammer
I originally thought orange banana, but realized banana wasn't a tool.Gigabyte GA-K8N Ultra 9, Opteron 170 Denmark 2x2Ghz, 2 GB Corsair XMS, Gigabyte 6600, Gentoo Linux
Motion Computing M1400 -- Tablet PC, Ubuntu Linux
"if I said you had a beautiful body would you take your pants off and dance around a bit?" --Zapp Brannigan
Comment
-
it's ok, we still adore you even if you are *snicker* normal *giggle*.Originally posted by Lizzard[MPE]i actually thought of red hammer.
what the ****.
teehee."And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz
Comment
-
Huh? It treats person as individual - everything is tied to context (not only of situation, but personal also) - I don't see how's that assuming we're lemmings. It's says much about the rules, process (in that regard, we are conditioned...after all we're all human beings of similar background)...but it doesn't care that much about what comes out of it, certainly not what will surely come out of it in every case.Originally posted by GurmIt's crap because it presumes that people are lemmings. While they cynical side of me agrees, it's bad to assume things like that.
It's just too convenient to say that we all think the same thing because of the way we're conditioned. Bleh.
Everyone loved Freud, too - until it became apparent to anyone with a critical mind that his work was only valid for middle aged European gentlemen who liked to smoke cigars and wanted to f**k their mothers.
Come to think of it...it's one of schools I like the most (the other thing is...I like in some way almost every one of them
- the key is knowing them all after all...)...in comparison to psychoanalisis, by using your example (btw, it's usefull, of course not how it was praised to be, more often than for analisys of European gentlemens - and, furthermore, Jewish, might I add
), it didn't ever try to be definitive answer to everything...but it's not bad in explaining the subjects it touches.
And psychotherapy based on it is kinda fun
Last edited by Nowhere; 19 April 2005, 16:53.
Comment
-
I think you are confused. Read what nowhere said. Just becuase gestalttherapy uses a set of tools based on a generalisation of certain aspects of human behaviour (or better on the link between physical and mental processes) does not mean it treats all people the same way or believes all people work in one well-defined conditioned manner. On the contrary, it is a very individual based approach that aims to help you see your own demons, your own, not the ones of someone like Freud where problems indeed always seem to be related to a fixed view on human behaviour. You ever read *anything* on this? Furthermore, even something that may not be universally valid, how is that *crap* by definition?Originally posted by GurmIt's crap because it presumes that people are lemmings. While they cynical side of me agrees, it's bad to assume things like that.
It's just too convenient to say that we all think the same thing because of the way we're conditioned. Bleh.Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
[...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen
Comment
-
Ok, I said it's crap because of the insinuation that the answer to why EVERYONE (or supposedly everyone) picks "RED HAMMER" could be found in this type of psychology. And it can't. As you said, as an individualized approach it can be useful - but to say that it can explain why "EVERYONE" thinks the same thing is ridiculous.Originally posted by UmfriendI think you are confused. Read what nowhere said. Just becuase gestalttherapy uses a set of tools based on a generalisation of certain aspects of human behaviour (or better on the link between physical and mental processes) does not mean it treats all people the same way or believes all people work in one well-defined conditioned manner. On the contrary, it is a very individual based approach that aims to help you see your own demons, your own, not the ones of someone like Freud where problems indeed always seem to be related to a fixed view on human behaviour. You ever read *anything* on this? Furthermore, even something that may not be universally valid, how is that *crap* by definition?The Internet - where men are men, women are men, and teenage girls are FBI agents!
I'm the least you could do
If only life were as easy as you
I'm the least you could do, oh yeah
If only life were as easy as you
I would still get screwed
Comment
-
Oh, sry, didn't get that context. Agreed. Wasn't that hard to misunderstand though.Join MURCs Distributed Computing effort for Rosetta@Home and help fight Alzheimers, Cancer, Mad Cow disease and rising oil prices.
[...]the pervading principle and abiding test of good breeding is the requirement of a substantial and patent waste of time. - Veblen
Comment
-
I thought orange _and_ drill. The drill was actually a red milwaukee pph24 (pneumatic hammer? not sure if it's the correct english name...)Originally posted by agallagRed Milwaukee 28V cordless hammer-drill. Is that close enough?
That's a color _and_ a tool right?
Comment
-
Well...it's not ridiculous (but also not true OTOH...it's a little more complicated). And...well it doesn't insinuate such thing, but it's not a bad tool for looking that answer; whether it can be found or not is a different matter...Originally posted by GurmOk, I said it's crap because of the insinuation that the answer to why EVERYONE (or supposedly everyone) picks "RED HAMMER" could be found in this type of psychology. And it can't. As you said, as an individualized approach it can be useful - but to say that it can explain why "EVERYONE" thinks the same thing is ridiculous.
PS. What do you propose instead?
(I guess not behaviorism...
)
Comment



Comment