I think it would be funny to know what's the worst car ever in your opionion
I think I'm not gonna answer: I'm not qualified (depending if you count moving a car a little on the parking or not, I have experience with 3 or 2 types of cars)
Why I ask that?
I've found opinion of Jeremy Clarkson that it's FSO Polonez: " Easy. The FSO Polonez. It was Polish and made from veal."
Which is a little...controversial. Well...yeah, it's shit on wheels, but objectively, Russian Lada 110 (currently produced) is worse - it isn't capable of driving 100km without repair after leaving the factory. Furthermore, Polonez isn't called tank for no reason (which means not only uncomfortable but also durable and quite powerfull (for the times; and besides not long ago new ones could reach well over 200kph, which introduced the need of limiters)...but no gain, because it's heavy (but OTOH no match for the "warszawa" or Russian "zaporozec" (GoogleImage: "zaz" - it's the bigger) - the amount of litres of fuel burnt equals to number of km driven - also called "T-34 Sport" or "Revenge of the Stalin"). Polonez: tragic finishing of details, ringing engine.
But...Clarkson tested the wrong version. He should either take version 2.0 with engine from Fiat (theorethically Polonez was suppose to be like that from the beginning) or later version with Rover (that was not bad)...and besides it should be compared with such powers as passat I or peugot 404.
Although really it's the only car known to me that's "oversteery-understeering"
I think I'm not gonna answer: I'm not qualified (depending if you count moving a car a little on the parking or not, I have experience with 3 or 2 types of cars)
Why I ask that?
I've found opinion of Jeremy Clarkson that it's FSO Polonez: " Easy. The FSO Polonez. It was Polish and made from veal."
Which is a little...controversial. Well...yeah, it's shit on wheels, but objectively, Russian Lada 110 (currently produced) is worse - it isn't capable of driving 100km without repair after leaving the factory. Furthermore, Polonez isn't called tank for no reason (which means not only uncomfortable but also durable and quite powerfull (for the times; and besides not long ago new ones could reach well over 200kph, which introduced the need of limiters)...but no gain, because it's heavy (but OTOH no match for the "warszawa" or Russian "zaporozec" (GoogleImage: "zaz" - it's the bigger) - the amount of litres of fuel burnt equals to number of km driven - also called "T-34 Sport" or "Revenge of the Stalin"). Polonez: tragic finishing of details, ringing engine.
But...Clarkson tested the wrong version. He should either take version 2.0 with engine from Fiat (theorethically Polonez was suppose to be like that from the beginning) or later version with Rover (that was not bad)...and besides it should be compared with such powers as passat I or peugot 404.
Although really it's the only car known to me that's "oversteery-understeering"
Comment