Originally posted by Evildead666
View Post
Have lots of lethal weapons lying around, people will use them, especially crooks.
You're arming both sides, we are not.
Here even the police departments are actually in on arming the citizenry; they offer marksmanship and combat training courses on their ranges, and many of the officers and police officer groups spoke in favor of the new laws in the legislature hearings. They admit that they can't be everywhere in a country this vast and that people will have to handle things on their own at times.
Also active in many states are womens groups since they are very often the victim of crimes. Smaller and not as strong a firearm becomes the equalizer, so much so that most of Michigans new pistol owners and CCW holders are now women of all ages. One is my wife Margie who was an experienced rifle/shotgun/compound bow user before getting her gun and permit. Believe me, anyone that takes her on will have their hands more than full.
In the end states where pistol ownership and CCW licenses are high have reduced their crime rates. This trend started with Florida which was one if the early states to liberalize licensing and ownership after some German tourists were killed during a robbery. Their crime rate dropped like a rock so other states followed suit in rapid order and had the same experience.
Proof is in the pudding.
You CANNOT justify arming the masses by any account.
Not unless we go back 2 or 300 years...
Examples of what we have -
SIG P-239 SAS .40 S&W (my carry piece)

Beretta 9000 S 9mm (wife's carry piece)

Ruger Super Blackhawk .44 magnum

Desert Eagle .50

Thompson Center Contender (hunting calibers by barrel swap up to 45-70)
AKA: "Dad's hand cannon" (all the kids name for it)


Comment