Originally posted by paulw
View Post
Originally posted by UtwigMU
View Post
We drove the Mazda CX-30. Ok, it was great. A bit of a cramped feeling inside (lower edge of the windows is quite high) but not disturbing (perhaps a bit more in the back). But the finishing, looks, comfort, ... superb. My wife loved the headup display, my brain just filtered it out
, perhaps I need more time to get used to it.Compared to the Subaru: in general a bit less space on the back and more difficult entry, slightly more enclosed/cramped feeling, a bit worse visibility (mainly to the back, but not as problematic as the C-HR) but it is still a candidate. It is cheaper than the Subaru - even in four wheel drive - and drives well. Should also be cheaper in maintenance (we asked costs). Fuel usage on paper is less, but some comparison reviews claim the CX-30 uses more than on paper while the XV uses less, putting them rather close.
According to reviews, the CX-30 has slightly higher highway noise (we did not get to test at highway speeds) and actually a worse gearbox (the CVT in Subaru's are apparently the best CVTs out there, while the Mazda has a rather primitive automatic gearbox). The CX-30 four wheel drive is not intended for off-roading (according to the Mazda user manual) but to provide stability and improved handling on normal roads. But it is not a permanent four wheel drive so a bit more limited (not sure if we would go for four wheel drive, but just listing the differences).
I did not have that zzhhhzzzzrrrrrrrrrrrzzzzzrrrrzzzz feeling you describe with the Subaru, the CH-R had it somewhat. But I don't care about noise: I want it to be quiet, so if the noise is not obtrusive, I don't care how it sounds like. The CH-R also had quite an annoying buzzing sound which lasted for 5-10 seconds, every half a minute or minute.
The smaller screen on the Mazda is compensated by a central driver screen: the speedometer is digital (its outline is fixed, but it can display other info) and the optional HUD. So there is more display real-estate than first meets the eye.
We also drove a Kia XCeed. It is a lower category of car (at a much lower price), but we had the opportunity. It is not a bad car. Not really what we are looking for, but I honestly can say that it drove ok, not too loud, quite good visibility. It had quite a weird engine noise, a low frequency woooo even at low speeds.
We also went to the DS Automobiles showroom: I wanted to see the DS4 upclose. On photos it looks nice and stylish, but in reality it looked kitchy and lacking style.

Leave a comment: