Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

g400(max) users , attention , THIS IS CRAZY !

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Hmmm nice combo G400+F500 :P

    I did a few benchmarks and I get a 3% hit avg when running 1280x32x85Hz VSYNC OFF compared to 1280x32x75Hz VSYNC OFF. I guess that's the disadvantage of single ported RAM kicking in.

    And DirectX 6.2 is on the G400 CD.
    P3@600 | Abit BH6 V1.01 NV | 256MB PC133 | G400MAX (EU,AGP2X) | Quantum Atlas 10K | Hitachi CDR-8330 | Diamond FirePort 40 | 3c905B-TX | TB Montego A3D(1) | IntelliMouse Explorer | Iiyama VisionMaster Pro 17 | Win2K/NT4

    Comment


    • #17
      grr.. I want an F500. Wish I had the cash.. they are WAY too expensive right now. Guess I'll have to live with my 400PS for the time being

      I agree with most here. Synchronize things and you will optimize your performance.

      Kindest Regards

      KvH

      Comment


      • #18
        Hey Tombman, welcome back...

        Are you using a BNC cable for that great monitor of yours???? If not get one, so you get every bit of goodness out of it. Put the D-sub cable on the V2 cards and switch back and forth between the G400 and the V2 cards with your monitor controls.

        Paul
        "Never interfere with the enemy when he is in the process of destroying himself"

        Comment


        • #19
          Albpm , hehe, thx pal , i never left , hihihihi.
          I am already using my g400max and v2sli exactly the way you proposed (bnc and d-sub switching with a single click of a button , hehe)(do you think i am an idiot not knowing what i have ?

          And heh, on MY g400 CD there is only directx 6.1 and NOT 6.2 !!!!!!

          p.s.: could someone mail me directx 6.2 AND
          MGAtweak ?????!!!!! P L E A S E !!!

          mail to : psycho6b@hotmail.com




          [This message has been edited by deprived (edited 08-21-1999).]

          Comment


          • #20
            Well tombman I redid my Q3 test using the custom settings that you gave. And at 1280x1024x32bit, the rest the same as above, with my monitor at 65Hz, that's it's max at that res, I got 17.3fps which is a far cry from your 7.9 So I say again something must be wrong. And as for my 3DMark99Max score that was at a 85Hz monitor setting, again the max my monitor can handle at that res.

            Joel
            Libertarian is still the way to go if we truly want a real change.

            www.lp.org

            ******************************

            System Specs: AMD XP2000+ @1.68GHz(12.5x133), ASUS A7V133-C, 512MB PC133, Matrox Parhelia 128MB, SB Live! 5.1.
            OS: Windows XP Pro.
            Monitor: Cornerstone c1025 @ 1280x960 @85Hz.

            Comment


            • #21
              Joel , check my posts carefully , please !
              I said that i made a mistake and that i get exactly the same scores with my g400max you get ....
              (forget those 7.9 numbers , they are wrong)

              At q3 1280*1024*32 all at the max i get 22.1 fps with my tnt2ultra at 170/210 !
              (i use my tnt2ultra for quaking , g400max is WAY to slow (opengl drivers are shit))

              BTW : At 1024*768*16 , 16 bit textures , bilinear , vsync off and all other settings at the max i get 52 fps !!! (try that with a g400max --> MUAHAHAHH)



              [This message has been edited by deprived (edited 08-21-1999).]

              Comment


              • #22
                Well, since you want to be such a dick about it, why don't you just figure it out for yourself.

                Joel

                [This message has been edited by Joel (edited 08-21-1999).]
                Libertarian is still the way to go if we truly want a real change.

                www.lp.org

                ******************************

                System Specs: AMD XP2000+ @1.68GHz(12.5x133), ASUS A7V133-C, 512MB PC133, Matrox Parhelia 128MB, SB Live! 5.1.
                OS: Windows XP Pro.
                Monitor: Cornerstone c1025 @ 1280x960 @85Hz.

                Comment


                • #23
                  No kidding,remember what happened last time? Try being a human about it, rather than acting like a 5yr. old kid. Sitting there going hahaha, TNT does this, try that with a G400 will get you nowhere. Anyways, I think the timeclock in Q3 test is still FUBAR'ed, I will be in a match and the screen will say 1 fps when there is absolutely no way that is one frame per second. If you want help, then accept the help, but don't be an ****ole.

                  Rags



                  ------------------
                  Some people call me the Space Cowboy.....


                  Comment


                  • #24
                    hi ! deprived ...

                    dont have much time..just to say DX6.2 came with WIN98SE after upgradeing from WIN98..& I realy dont think that is an advantage over DX6.1 & that useing it will incrase your performance much..as I knowe they are not for download ..why ? ...duno,they came only with WIN98SE...I cant make TEST @1280x1024 with 100Hz because I have 15inch monitor.. I can get only 800x600 refreshed by 100hz if that helps I make some for U...

                    must go !

                    bye

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      A bit off topic, but what do I type in the console to display the fps during gameplay? It was like ?_fps 1 or something like that, but I forgot....

                      Thanks

                      Comment


                      • #26

                        Hi Greebe,

                        I understand what you mean, I also understand why benchmarking is important.

                        I guess I didn't get my words out right, oh well.


                        DK

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Joel and ragsdale : i don´t know what is wrong with you because whenever i "insult" a VIDEO CARD you feel personally attacked !!!!

                          I mean i own a g400max myself and i know that it sucks in opengl BUT I am not that psychically bound to this product so that i have to feel offended whenever someone touches it !! Everyone on the internet KNOWS that it sucks in opengl and i really don´t understand why you freak out whenever someone
                          reminds you about it !
                          I have nothing against you personally but i don´t want to be deprived from the right to say that in some situations the g400(max) sucks . If this is not allowed in a matrox forum then please tell me and all the other people that there is a censor !

                          Ok, other topic now , i don´t think that the framecounter in q3 is still broken because we all are quakers for a long time now and we have a very good feel if a card produces 10 fps 20 fps or 30 fps . I mean if it takes half the time for the benchmark to complete with the tnt2ultra then with the g400max then I KNOW that the g400max is slower than the tnt2ultra in opengl ...period.

                          Slartibart has given me the idea that the monitor can be the problem so i changed it to a generic type at 60 hz refresh and all was fine ...BUT IT IS CLEAR THAT THE G400(MAX) HAS A PROBLEM WITH MONITORS !!
                          (i will call matrox on monday and see what they have to say about it ..)

                          Cu ...

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Joel and ragsdale : i don´t know what is wrong with you because whenever i "insult" a VIDEO CARD you feel personally attacked !!!!
                            I have never felt personally attacked over an insult over a video card, it is just that in one post you are completely baffled by your performance, then in another post you are saying that there is no way it will ever perform, GET A LIFE!!!

                            I mean i own a g400max myself and i know that it sucks in opengl BUT I am not that psychically bound to this product so that i have to feel offended whenever someone touches it !! Everyone on the internet KNOWS that it sucks in opengl and i really don´t understand why you freak out whenever someone reminds you about it !
                            If everyone on the internet seems to know that it "sucks" in OpenGL, then why do you always have to post it over and over and over and over. Anyhow I don't think that playing above 1024 32bit with all details on, and having it playable means it sucks, but I guess I don't sit there and contemplate benchmarks all day. You must, again GET A LIFE!!!


                            Ok, other topic now , i don´t think that the framecounter in q3 is still broken because we all are quakers for a long time now and we have a very good feel if a card produces 10 fps 20 fps or 30 fps . I mean if it takes half the time for the benchmark to complete with the tnt2ultra then with the g400max then I KNOW that the g400max is slower than the tnt2ultra in opengl ...period.
                            Okay, first of all the benchmark does not take any longer to complete using the TNT2 over the G400 or vice versa.
                            Secondly I am saying that I am pretty confident that the benchmark is not very accurate. I will post some screen shots of a TNT2 pulling 400 Fps if you like. There is no way in Hell, that this can happen. And I can play on my system, when it says I am doing 1fps when there is no way in hell that is occurring. There is something wrong with.....PERIOD!!!!!!

                            Slartibart has given me the idea that the monitor can be the problem so i changed it to a generic type at 60 hz refresh and all was fine ...BUT IT IS CLEAR THAT THE G400(MAX) HAS A PROBLEM WITH MONITORS !!
                            It is clear that you have not been reading the posts around here, because you would have seen that there appears to be a problem with the drivers (G200 or G400/Max), NOT THE CARD!! I guess there is going to be a fix on the way.

                            As far as your attitude, I really think that if you want to discuss things in a logical manner, you won't come in here shouting (yes, all caps is shouting), and posting the same shit as you have been. We all know you think the G400 Max is slow, we all know you think that the TNT2 is the end all be all of video cards. That doesn't affect me one way or the other. What does affect me is you come here posing like you have a problem, and want to get help fixing it, then people go and try to help, and then you turn into a total dick about the situation, and go on with diarhea of the mouth. Tone it down and you will get help. I know that if I had your card and system, I am 99% sure (the 1% being you got a faulty card) that I could bump up every single benchmark you have posted, and the TNT2 Ultra would be left behind in the dust. Oh yeah and next time you compare benchmarks of 2 different video cards, make sure that if one is overclocked, the next card is oc'ed too, and not use hacks. That is the ONLY way to get fair benchmarks.

                            Rags

                            ------------------
                            Some people call me the Space Cowboy.....




                            [This message has been edited by M Ragsdale (edited 08-21-1999).]

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Dear Deprived,


                              I feel another delete comming on.....

                              Lets help him think of another name for future reference....hmmm...? how bout "Whinner"? or "Bitch"? Help me out here folks...

                              CoolBreeze aka KAST
                              P3 500(not overclocked)
                              128 MB PC100 SDRAM
                              SE440BX-2 Motherboard by Intel
                              Seagate 8.4 gig HDD
                              Diamond MX300 Sound Card
                              AOpen 40x CD ROM
                              Ethernet 32 bit PCI Card
                              Motorola Cable Modem
                              Matrox G400 32 OEM Single Head @150
                              17" CRT Monitor
                              Altec Lansing 2 Speakers and Sub

                              ----CoolBreeze aka KAST----

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Matt, once again a valiant effort. It appears, however,that our deprived soul here is a mere drug-induced schizophrenic rather than a psychotic hacker wannabe like, um, who could I be thinking of?

                                You might not want to waste your time.. he will probably come down soon, realize how he has abused the goodwill shown him, and be quite remorseful. Until then, enough with this thread (for me at least)

                                Kind Regards,

                                KvH

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X