Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Are we EVER going to see another high-end card from Matrox?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Source Dogbert?
    Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
    Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
    Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSI

    Comment


    • #32
      I think this was Dogbert's idea of a joke. Wasn't the Cirrus Logic 5446 popular back in the days when the Millennium ruled the earth (ca. 1995)..?

      Comment


      • #33
        LOL I do remember I even owned one in the 486 age.



        I still got a GD 5480
        Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
        Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
        Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSI

        Comment


        • #34
          I still own a CL 5446 !!

          God, how I“m happy about that

          Comment


          • #36
            Maggi !!!

            Long time no see

            Thanks, I just altered a real news item about Matrox not going to Cebit...

            Comment


            • #37
              DOH !
              System : ASUS A8N SLI premium, Athlon 64X2 3800+, 2Gb, T7K500 320Gb SATAII, T7K250 250Gb SATAII, T7K250 250Gb ATA133, Nec ND-3520, Plextor PX130A, SB Audigy 2, Sapphire Radeon X800 GTO, 24" Dell 2407WFP.

              Comment


              • #38
                Dont spread this news on the web........

                Comment


                • #39
                  Very funny piece of work Dogbert.

                  I guess every user needing dual-head would be lucky enough to get 2 CL5446's, strapped to a couple of 14" NEC monitors (1024x768, interlaced) purchased on e-bay and they're ready for some dual-head lovin'.
                  Alcohol and Drugs make life tolerable.

                  Comment


                  • #40
                    The dual-head on my millenium is rooted so I"ve found an S3 Virge 4Mb to quench my dual-head cravings..
                    We seldom attribute common sense except to those who agree with us.
                    __________________
                    The Darkside: OCN HellSpawn - Having our way with your daughter's genes

                    Comment


                    • #41
                      Re: MATROX CHOSEN FOR WORLD'S FASTEST PC!

                      Originally posted by Tempest
                      Japanese Holicho is one mean overclocker, this time he used a 2,2 GHz Northwood P4. Of course, when overclocking he'll use only the absolutely best hardware there is - that's why his display adapter is a 4 meg Matrox Millennium
                      Using liquid nitrogen cooling he is currently able to reach clock speeds excelling 3,5 GHz...
                      When I was scanning his site I couldn't help but wonder what he could do to AMD CPU's, would be interesting. They wouldn't OC aswell but it would still be interesting.

                      Comment


                      • #42
                        Re: Re: MATROX CHOSEN FOR WORLD'S FASTEST PC!

                        You can try asking that from another Japanese fellow, ja0hxv: http://ja0hxv.calico.jp/pai/exp8k7ah5.html
                        If I remember correctly the XP 2000+ is actually running at 1667 MHz, which makes the result 1667@2312. Don't compare the PiFast times with those found on my previously posted Finnish overclocking link though, they use different settings as well as a different version of PiFast.

                        -Tempest, leading discussions offtopic since 1978

                        Comment


                        • #43
                          Re: MATROX CHOSEN FOR WORLD'S FASTEST PC!

                          Originally posted by Tempest
                          Edit: Okay, so it isn't world's fastest PC anymore: http://www.muropaketti.com/artikkeli...n2/index.phtml [/B]
                          Someone crossed the 3.7 Ghz boundary.
                          Main: Dual Xeon LV2.4Ghz@3.1Ghz | 3X21" | NVidia 6800 | 2Gb DDR | SCSI
                          Second: Dual PIII 1GHz | 21" Monitor | G200MMS + Quadro 2 Pro | 512MB ECC SDRAM | SCSI
                          Third: Apple G4 450Mhz | 21" Monitor | Radeon 8500 | 1,5Gb SDRAM | SCSI

                          Comment


                          • #44
                            are these crazy overclocks only possible in a short timespan, or do somebody actually use their computer with these settings?

                            it is my impression, that these overclockers do it as a hobby/sport, and that they can“t archieve a high overclock, that can run anything else than a benchmark for 5 minutes without crashing.

                            what is the highest STABLE overclock, that can actually be used???
                            This sig is a shameless atempt to make my post look bigger.

                            Comment


                            • #45
                              It's just sport. Some of those guys show their processor temp, and it's at -20C or lower. Neither practical nor sustainable.
                              Gigabyte P35-DS3L with a Q6600, 2GB Kingston HyperX (after *3* bad pairs of Crucial Ballistix 1066), Galaxy 8800GT 512MB, SB X-Fi, some drives, and a Dell 2005fpw. Running WinXP.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X