Pitou

[Enak]

I wish...

[Ulukay]

maybee Matrox will NOW be able to make a grapic card which is faster than a TI4600

[Enak]

They already have!

[Ulukay]

where?

[Sasq]

Sigh

[Ulukay]

oo i forgot

if you take ut2k3 with 1600, 16x fsaa and 128x Af then the parhelia gets 3 fps and the ti4600 only 2fps

wow - what a good card ... and so playable

[GNEP]

Where it matters.

[Maggi]

Originally posted by Ulukay
oo i forgot

if you take ut2k3 with 1600, 16x fsaa and 128x Af then the parhelia gets 3 fps and the ti4600 only 2fps

wow - what a good card ... and so playable

look at any 3D Mark's "8 lights high polygon" test ...

[Enak]

Thank you Maggi

[Maggi]

I see an analogy to cars when looking at Parhelia vs. GF4 ...

"capacity instead of spoilers"

[Rimfaxe]

Originally posted by Ulukay
maybee Matrox will NOW be able to make a grapic card which is faster than a TI4600

Flame bait?

[Enak]

Incidently I get 20-25 FPS in UT2003 highest settings 1600x1200 16xFAA

It's playable

[Ulukay]

Originally posted by Maggi


look at any 3D Mark's "8 lights high polygon" test ...

i don't give much on THEORETICAL tests

where do this test matter in real world gaming?

[Sasq]

ahh yes, we forgot, the world revolves around gaming. profesionals never, ever use computers for anything

mo ikai

[Maggi]

Originally posted by Ulukay


i don't give much on THEORETICAL tests

where do this test matter in real world gaming?

in any game that uses more than one light source ...