And you can't even beging to comapre these pre-1970 muscle cars to the pre-1970 classics like the Ferraris, Maseratis, Alfas, Lotus's or even Mercedes.
These cars had history, design handling and power, they were designed for racing, in fact Europe started buidling cars for racing way before anyone else even began to think about it.
If I were to choose, I would take the Ferrari Daytona, or the Dino, Short nose 512B or even the old Testarossa.
Heck Fangio drove the 250F Maserati in Germany and won his final race back in 1957.
Maserati was racing since 1926!!!!!
Now that is history guys, not some old boxes with big engines like the Montecarlo or Chevelle SS 454 etc. Uhh no offense Lizzy
The only company at the time that I admire was Ford for building the GT40 which was truly an outstanding car.
Cheers,
Elie
These cars had history, design handling and power, they were designed for racing, in fact Europe started buidling cars for racing way before anyone else even began to think about it.
If I were to choose, I would take the Ferrari Daytona, or the Dino, Short nose 512B or even the old Testarossa.
Heck Fangio drove the 250F Maserati in Germany and won his final race back in 1957.
Maserati was racing since 1926!!!!!
Now that is history guys, not some old boxes with big engines like the Montecarlo or Chevelle SS 454 etc. Uhh no offense Lizzy
The only company at the time that I admire was Ford for building the GT40 which was truly an outstanding car.
Cheers,
Elie
Originally posted by Brian R.
Just a big sewing machine engine
Realistically, you can't compare the pre-1970 muscle cars with the $50-100k cars you are talking about.
Just a big sewing machine engine
Realistically, you can't compare the pre-1970 muscle cars with the $50-100k cars you are talking about.
Comment