No Dx9 features, im using DVI so i cant see any banding, will check it later against the analogue signal, also will play some games with faa on to see if it has been improved at all. Here are the aquamark benchies at standard clocks:
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
PHA8x128 arrived today!
Collapse
X
-
here are the aquamarks for 302/392. Rock solid stable.
is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
Talk about a dream, try to make it real.
Comment
-
Thank you, looks good!
If FAA works perfect now and there is no banding... !P IV 3,06 Ghz, GA-8ihxp i850e, 512 MB PC-1066 RDRam, Parhelia 128 mb 8x, 40 + 60 gb IBM 7200 upm/2048 kb HD, Samtron 96 P 19", black icemat, Razer Boomslang 2100 krz-2 + mousebungee, Videologic sonic fury, Creative Soundworks
Comment
-
Ehhh. PPL!!!! It's the same card as Parhelia AGPx4. It's only little overclocked & with bugfixes of the core. It was maked the same time as AGPx4 version. So don't expect anythign new. It will be just little faster without core bugs that got AGPx4 version. Nothing more!A CRAY is the only computer that runs an endless loop in just 4 hours...
Comment
-
yep nicram is right about that, looks like the banding has gone and faa is looking better, will post screenies later. If it werent for the fact that i "aquired" a P256 for a P128 bulk price and was able to sell it at the same cost as this new 128, i would not have upgraded, it probably worth about £50 above the old card if you can sell your old one on ebay or something, and its worth it if your looking for a brand new parhelia. But not to upgrade and throw the old P out. heres aquamark, 250/300, with Faa forced.
is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
Talk about a dream, try to make it real.
Comment
-
16xfaa, 300/390. Thats the last one im planning on doing, if anybody else wants anything done or wants to know anything then just tell me and ill get the results as soon as i can. If this had been out 18 months ago...is a flower best picked in it's prime or greater withered away by time?
Talk about a dream, try to make it real.
Comment
-
What about benching with a unreal 2 and a Q3 engine based game (ut for example)? Would be quite interesting!P IV 3,06 Ghz, GA-8ihxp i850e, 512 MB PC-1066 RDRam, Parhelia 128 mb 8x, 40 + 60 gb IBM 7200 upm/2048 kb HD, Samtron 96 P 19", black icemat, Razer Boomslang 2100 krz-2 + mousebungee, Videologic sonic fury, Creative Soundworks
Comment
-
Actually Nicam this card is not OC'd. The original core was suppose to hit 300mHz. So it can be said this one is spot on with what they originally designed it todo (in all aspects) and the others were underclocked/buggy.
If he knew so much then he'd also know what this card was taped out at and the projected running speed was.
I do dislike putting the smack down on him, but he played alot of people. Much like Jorden did and leaked alot of info while playing Matrox for fools so he could gain viewership on his site."Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter, and those who matter don't mind." -- Dr. Seuss
"Always do good. It will gratify some and astonish the rest." ~Mark Twain
Comment
-
Originally posted by Greebe
Actually Nicam this card is not OC'd. The original core was suppose to hit 300mHz. So it can be said this one is spot on with what they originally designed it todo (in all aspects) and the others were underclocked/buggy.
If he knew so much then he'd also know what this card was taped out at and the projected running speed was.
I do dislike putting the smack down on him, but he played alot of people. Much like Jorden did and leaked alot of info while playing Matrox for fools so he could gain viewership on his site.<TABLE BGCOLOR=Red><TR><TD><Font-weight="+1"><font COLOR=Black>The world just changed, Sep. 11, 2001</font></Font-weight></TR></TD></TABLE>
Comment
-
2 years too late. For the cost and by the time it is available, you would be better off buying an ATI or NVidia. Not only are their architectures light years ahead of Matrox's, so are their drivers.
not worth the money."And yet, after spending 20+ years trying to evolve the user interface into something better, what's the most powerful improvement Apple was able to make? They finally put a god damned shell back in." -jwz
Comment
-
While quite an improvement over the original P, the original P really had to be the P8X for true success.
Now, they will never really take the commercial market, and I doubt I'll be buying Matrox again....unless I see proper AMD64 support for both Linux and Windows, as well as DX9 hardware.
I'm very much leaning towards NVidia for my next card...Let us return to the moon, to stay!!!
Comment
Comment